Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5474
Next month in: 00:55:45
Server time: 11:04:14, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of March 2166

Details

Submitted by[?]: Vuloch Ca Korzia

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 2166

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date14:10:11, January 04, 2006 CET
FromVuloch Ca Korzia
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2166
MessageI hope this is acceptable to all. I have tried to balance interests, and I urge you all to support this coalition government of national unity.

Date17:41:31, January 04, 2006 CET
FromSocial Democratic Party of Darnussia
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2166
MessageI am not too happy about being in the same cabinet as CED

Date18:26:27, January 04, 2006 CET
FromVuloch Ca Korzia
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2166
Messageooc: offs, don't expect me to arbitrate between you two in the future if you can't stay reconciled.

ic:

Then your position in the cabinet may be in danger.

Date18:55:21, January 04, 2006 CET
FromSocial Democratic Party of Darnussia
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2166
MessageWe have not got any problem with being in the same cabinet with CED, however the SDP finding it difficult to trust the CED again

Date04:29:59, January 05, 2006 CET
FromSocial Democratic Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2166
MessageI really wouldn't complain if I were you.

And as for my vote, I abstain. I appreciate my position in the cabinet but I refuse to vote away my hold on Prime Ministership.

Though I don't think this cabinet needs my vote to go through.

I'm not against it, but I'm not totally in favor of it. Hence, I abstain.

Date04:42:19, January 05, 2006 CET
FromDarnussian Strength Initiative
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2166
MessageI truly appreciate what you have offered here and thank you, but I cannot, in good conscience vote for a cabinet that includes the SDP. They are power hungry and have already shown that they are willing to sabotage the democratic process to get power.

I would like to point out that neither CED nor SDP approval is needed, LBSC will support if he keeps his Prime Ministership, and I will support if I get defence, justice, internal affairs.

Date05:29:12, January 05, 2006 CET
FromSocialist Party of Darnussia
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2166
MessageI would prefer a cabinet which includes my party. My party holds views that are similar to yours and has more seats than the Social Democrats or the Chinkopodian Economic Democrats, not to mention the New Liberal Alliance. Please propose a cabinet with representation for my party.

Date06:43:37, January 05, 2006 CET
FromSocial Democratic Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2166
MessageYou read my mind...yeah I would support if I keep Prime Ministership.

Date12:22:30, January 05, 2006 CET
FromSocial Democratic Party of Darnussia
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2166
MessageVCK, why dont you just leave CA and LBSC out of it? Surely their comments here prove they are nothing but slef obessed and power hungery themselves and unwilling to co-operate to create a good government

Date12:41:53, January 05, 2006 CET
FromVuloch Ca Korzia
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2166
MessageI made a promise to make a cabinet of all the talents and all of the political spectrum. I urge the LBSC and CA to vote for this, for if you abstain then the proposal cannot pass. I ask SPD and the other parties to resolve their differences, or some extremely painful decisions will have to be made.

Date13:44:24, January 05, 2006 CET
FromDarnussian Strength Initiative
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2166
MessageSo sabotaging government is all forgivable once you back someone for HoG?

Date18:25:02, January 05, 2006 CET
FromVuloch Ca Korzia
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2166
MessageI'm sorry? I've nominated YOU for HoG...

Date22:50:17, January 05, 2006 CET
FromSocial Democratic Party of Darnussia
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2166
MessageCA is not willing to work with any party, it is not willing to have any position, Just put NLA and Pop front in

Date23:49:27, January 05, 2006 CET
FromDarnussian Strength Initiative
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2166
Messageto VCK: I meant SPD's support of you for HoS, I get the two mixed up.

And to the SDP, this party is willing to work with any party that is loyal to this nation and not hellbent on merely improving their own power. You have quickly forgotten that I have offered cabinet posts to the LBSC, CED, VCK, NLA, and CPD. Meanwhile, you have been forming opposition groups and alienating all parties with poison bills.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 198

no
 

Total Seats: 71

abstain
   

Total Seats: 281


Random fact: Party candidates for head of state elections are not visible to the public. This means that you cannot see who will run and who will not, which adds another strategic element to the elections.

Random quote: "The strongest reason for people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government." - Thomas Jefferson

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 75