We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Private Media Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: National Socialist Fatherland Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 3766
Description[?]:
Gentlemen (and of course ladies) of the Presidium, why are we promoting communism within our media? We should turn the co-operatives into much more efficient and capitalist public corporations. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Television stations.
Old value:: The government subsidises independent non-profit-making cooperatives for educational and informational purposes; other private non-subsidised TV stations are allowed.
Current: The government subsidises independent non-profit-making cooperatives for educational and informational purposes; other private non-subsidised TV stations are allowed.
Proposed: The government subsidises a national TV station for educational and informational purposes; other private non-subsidised TV stations are allowed.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Radio stations.
Old value:: The government subsidises independent non-profit-making cooperatives for educational and informational purposes; other private non-subsidised radio stations are allowed.
Current: The government subsidises independent non-profit-making cooperatives for educational and informational purposes; other private non-subsidised radio stations are allowed.
Proposed: The government subsidises a national radio station for educational and informational purposes; other private non-subsidised radio stations are allowed.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 21:31:31, November 29, 2014 CET | From | Party of Love and Flowers | To | Debating the Private Media Act |
Message | Mr. Speaker, this is scandalous, this deprive the workers of any right they might have in the mediatic news, right now, only some medias give workers some democratic rights. the national conservative union promote a very limited democracy. Evgeny Darklight, EPLLCP leader. |
Date | 21:33:55, November 29, 2014 CET | From | National Socialist Fatherland Party | To | Debating the Private Media Act |
Message | Mr Speaker, We would like to address the "concerns" of the communists. Firstly, workers already have democratic rights. They can strike can they not? The market itself is democratic. Capitalism is democratic. We promote the idea of a Republic not a Tyranny by the majority. ------ Party Leader Frederick Kingsley |
Date | 21:35:26, November 29, 2014 CET | From | Party of Love and Flowers | To | Debating the Private Media Act |
Message | Mr. Speaker, when you restrain democratic to striking, you are mocking democracy, the EPLLCP does not promote tyranny by the majority but the NCU promote tyranny of the minority |
Date | 21:37:53, November 29, 2014 CET | From | National Socialist Fatherland Party | To | Debating the Private Media Act |
Message | Mr Speaker, The unions and "democratic" organizations are merely fronts for the EPLLCP. ---- Party Leader Frederick Kingsley |
Date | 21:40:28, November 29, 2014 CET | From | Party of Love and Flowers | To | Debating the Private Media Act |
Message | Mr. Speaker, the EPLLCP support democratie and is itself the most democratic party in the world. |
Date | 00:13:11, November 30, 2014 CET | From | People of Freedom (P.F) | To | Debating the Private Media Act |
Message | Mr. Speaket. Down with communism in all its negative forms. Down. Matteo Powers JDP leader |
Date | 00:28:03, November 30, 2014 CET | From | New Democratic Party | To | Debating the Private Media Act |
Message | Mr. Speaker, I don't see a communism in current law. Oppose. Katy Bachelor, Education and Culture spokesman of RPF |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes | Total Seats: 94 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 505 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Characters are considered to be "owned" by the player who first mentioned or created them. In practice, players may share responsibility for role-playing a character, but ultimate authority rests with the owner. |
Random quote: "Sometimes it is said that man cannot be trusted with the government of himself. Can he, then, be trusted with the government of others?" - Thomas Jefferson |