Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 5472
Next month in: 02:10:32
Server time: 01:49:27, April 20, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: NPH Wants To Rebuild Luthori

Details

Submitted by[?]: Free White Castle and The People Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 2167

Description[?]:

Luthori needs and infastructure overhall to prepare us as we ever near the 23rd century. Our infastructure hinders our economy and poses a threat to our national security.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date22:35:19, January 04, 2006 CET
FromSeosavists Republican party
ToDebating the NPH Wants To Rebuild Luthori
MessageI disagree with artical 1 and 5, if you take them out I'll vote yes

Date22:50:51, January 04, 2006 CET
FromRedneck Party
ToDebating the NPH Wants To Rebuild Luthori
MessageWasteful spending. No

Date05:01:32, January 05, 2006 CET
FromLuthori Green Party
ToDebating the NPH Wants To Rebuild Luthori
MessageI can only agree with articles two, six, and seven,

Date05:20:51, January 05, 2006 CET
FromFree White Castle and The People Party
ToDebating the NPH Wants To Rebuild Luthori
MessageWhat are your objections to 3 and 4? The power grid seemed something of great national interest and to leave it in the hands of private industry is potentially very dangerous. Firefighting seems like it should generally be handled locally as local government could best understand the needs for fire safety and prevention.

Date05:46:21, January 05, 2006 CET
FromLuthori Green Party
ToDebating the NPH Wants To Rebuild Luthori
MessageArticle three I can go with, but with article four, I have problems leaving important decisions to regional government.

Date09:57:22, January 05, 2006 CET
FromCovenanters (IA)
ToDebating the NPH Wants To Rebuild Luthori
MessageWe can only support article 1. The rest is just tax and spend commie nationalisation.

Date10:18:43, January 05, 2006 CET
FromLuthori Green Party
ToDebating the NPH Wants To Rebuild Luthori
MessageTax and spend nationalisation, go you good thing, go.

Date10:37:25, January 05, 2006 CET
FromFree White Castle and The People Party
ToDebating the NPH Wants To Rebuild Luthori
MessageDo you like nuclear power? That isn't really much of a pro environmental position.

Date10:38:54, January 05, 2006 CET
FromLuthori Green Party
ToDebating the NPH Wants To Rebuild Luthori
MessageI'm not for it as such, but unless we can provide an alternative, it is better than coal and gas.

Date11:05:53, January 05, 2006 CET
FromCovenanters (IA)
ToDebating the NPH Wants To Rebuild Luthori
Message... much better than fossil fuels and as such a pro-environment position.

Date11:22:32, January 05, 2006 CET
FromLuthori Green Party
ToDebating the NPH Wants To Rebuild Luthori
MessageThe only problem is the radioactive waste, maybe Deltaria would take it...

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 112

no
     

Total Seats: 638

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Real-life organisations should not be referenced in Particracy, unless they are simple and generic (eg. "National Organisation for Women" is allowed).

Random quote: "A people that values its privileges above its principles soon loses both." - Dwight D. Eisenhower

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 102