Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5474
Next month in: 03:12:23
Server time: 12:47:36, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): echizen | itsjustgav | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: First National Socialism Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: National Socialist Fatherland Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 3775

Description[?]:

Hail Lodamun! We propose nationalizing industry and forming single monopolies and groupings of industries to ensure that foreigners cannot destroy our economy.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date23:26:16, December 16, 2014 CET
From Great National Republican Guard
ToDebating the First National Socialism Act
MessageMr. Speaker,

Isn't it ironic that these proposals are from the same party that complains about our current political system as "a Socialist bureaucracy" ? http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=424014

And it's it hilarious that this is the same party that proposed the Free Market Act? http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=423550

As I have warned over and over again, Wolfe Stanford's party doesn't know what it stands for.

--

Andre Fertig,
Chairman of the GNRG

Date23:27:57, December 16, 2014 CET
FromNational Socialist Fatherland Party
ToDebating the First National Socialism Act
MessageMr Speaker,

National Socialism and Socialism are two distinct things. We proposed the Free Market Act to deconstruct the socialist industries that had built up.

------
Party Leader Wolfe Stanford

Date23:36:40, December 16, 2014 CET
From Great National Republican Guard
ToDebating the First National Socialism Act
MessageMr. Speaker,

Regardless of what Wolfe Stanford says, he is advocating for more state bureaucracy in the economy.

Also, he just admitted that he deceived the Presidium when he proposed to have a free market, when he wanted the exact opposite.

It's funny how he complains about bureaucracy and distrust in the Presidium - http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=424014 - when his party is advocating for more state bureaucracy and his party can't be trusted by the Presidium.

--

Andre Fertig,
Chairman of the GNRG

Date00:09:42, December 17, 2014 CET
FromEcumenical Constitutional Democrat Party
ToDebating the First National Socialism Act
MessageMr Speaker,

We Monotheists will be at the forefront of the battle against Nazism and Fascism in this country! They are modernist heresies.

Date04:12:34, December 18, 2014 CET
FromVorona Conservative Party
ToDebating the First National Socialism Act
Message(Crackling noises followed by a patriotic march tune)

This is a message brought to you by the National Socialist Voronan Workers Party.

Friends, Lodamese, countrymen, lend me your ears! Support the National Socialist Fatherland Party! They care about the poor! They care about the people! No more will the fat cats on Floor St. rule the government! It's time for a change and a revolution! Vote NSFP and Wolfe Stanford in the next election! HAIL!

This was a message brought to you by the National Socialist Voronan Workers Party.

(Ends with patriotic tune)

Date16:30:51, December 18, 2014 CET
FromPeople of Freedom (P.F)
ToDebating the First National Socialism Act
MessageMr. Speaker.

What the ell was this infiltration of our airwaves. We need to secure this. Signals are vital.

Raven Valentinn
Minister of Internal Affairs, Director of the LSS

Date16:35:47, December 18, 2014 CET
FromEcumenical Constitutional Democrat Party
ToDebating the First National Socialism Act
MessageMr. Speaker,

We suggest that Vorona be bombarded by rockets!

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 136

no
   

Total Seats: 341

abstain
  

Total Seats: 122


Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play.

Random quote: "Economic advance is not the same thing as human progress." - John Clapham

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 123