We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Traxian Imperial Proposals 3
Details
Submitted by[?]: Traxian Imperial Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2167
Description[?]:
| Due to our shift in politics we propose this for our Civil Rights |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning who can proceed with adoption; in case adoption is legal.
Old value:: Everyone may adopt children.
Current: Everyone may adopt children.
Proposed: Only heterosexual couples may adopt children.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government position in respect to crossdressing policy.
Old value:: Crossdressing is allowed.
Current: Crossdressing is allowed.
Proposed: Crossdressing is prohibited by the state.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The legality of divorces (if marriages are recognised).
Old value:: Divorces are legal, be it mutual consent, grounded cause or if one partner wants it.
Current: Divorces are legal, be it mutual consent, grounded cause or if one partner wants it.
Proposed: Only divorces that comply with religious doctrine are legal.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding the initiation of divorces (if allowed).
Old value:: Either partner may initiate a divorce.
Current: Either partner may initiate a divorce.
Proposed: Local governments decide who can initiate a divorce.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 07:38:33, January 05, 2006 CET | From | Totalitarian Party | To | Debating the Traxian Imperial Proposals 3 |
| Message | The Totalitarian Party requests articles two, six, eight and nine be split. Also, in Traxian Imperial Proposals 2, article one states that all abortions be made illegal. However, in this bill you have article nine imposing abortions on people who circumvent parenting tests. Why the inconsistent policy? Wouldn't forcing the parents to give up the baby make more sense, and be in-line with your current policies? We would be willing to support either, but would prefer forcing the parents to place the child for adoption. |
| Date | 09:41:45, January 05, 2006 CET | From | Traxian Imperial Party | To | Debating the Traxian Imperial Proposals 3 |
| Message | Damm those remaining liberal ponses, the problem has been 'delt' with. |
| Date | 09:43:18, January 05, 2006 CET | From | Traxian Imperial Party | To | Debating the Traxian Imperial Proposals 3 |
| Message | Split will be done. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes | Total Seats: 41 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 382 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 18 |
| Random fact: "OOC", "IC" and "IG" are commonly-used acronyms in Particracy. "OOC" refers to comments, discussions and actions which are out-of-character, meaning they are done player-to-player rather than party-to-party. "IC" refers to in-character interactions (ie. party-to-party). Similarly, "IG" means in-game, although this term may also simply refer to what happens in the actual game interface, as opposed to on the forum or elsewhere. "RP" just means "role-play". |
| Random quote: "A proof is a proof. What kind of a proof? It's a proof. A proof is a proof. And when you have a good proof, it's because it's proven." - Jean Chretien (describing the level of proof about weapons of mass destruction that Canada required to join the Iraq War) |