Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5471
Next month in: 02:19:37
Server time: 05:40:22, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): ShadowSneak | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Common Sense Health Reforms Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Anti-Ownership Federation Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 2168

Description[?]:

I am focused on getting this bill passed and am open to any suggestions.... i can split some of these into a new bill if any of you wish

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date10:47:31, January 05, 2006 CET
FromTelamon Social Democratic Party
ToDebating the Common Sense Health Reforms Act
MessageA1 OK
A2 OK
A3 OK
A4 no
A5 I would take the middle otion "The government pays partially for all citizens' pharmaceutical drugs, and pays entirely for those of low income citizens."
A6 no
A7 OK
A8 OK
A9

Date10:48:02, January 05, 2006 CET
FromTelamon Social Democratic Party
ToDebating the Common Sense Health Reforms Act
MessageA9 OK

Date11:11:33, January 05, 2006 CET
FromAnti-Ownership Federation Party
ToDebating the Common Sense Health Reforms Act
Messagewith regards to a5, i do not like the use of a solid line classing low-income and non low-income citizens.... the distinction should not be black and white......
also in regards with this specific issue, pharmaceutical companies should not benefit at the expense of the sick....

Date11:12:01, January 05, 2006 CET
FromAnti-Ownership Federation Party
ToDebating the Common Sense Health Reforms Act
Messagewhy do you support legalising drugs?

Date14:45:46, January 05, 2006 CET
FromRationalist Party
ToDebating the Common Sense Health Reforms Act
MessageI do not support #'s 3, 5, 8 or 9

Date17:37:33, January 05, 2006 CET
FromTelamon National Party
ToDebating the Common Sense Health Reforms Act
MessageI do not support a few of them so no sorry.

Date02:15:45, January 06, 2006 CET
FromAnti-Ownership Federation Party
ToDebating the Common Sense Health Reforms Act
Messagewhich ones???

Date02:15:56, January 06, 2006 CET
FromAnti-Ownership Federation Party
ToDebating the Common Sense Health Reforms Act
Messagewhich ones???

Date14:46:15, January 06, 2006 CET
FromUnited Liberal Alliance
ToDebating the Common Sense Health Reforms Act
MessageI don't like any of them

Date16:32:56, January 06, 2006 CET
FromUnited Labour Party of Telamon
ToDebating the Common Sense Health Reforms Act
MessageI support 2 and 3.

Date00:07:33, January 07, 2006 CET
FromConservative Party of Telamon
ToDebating the Common Sense Health Reforms Act
MessageNo, maybe, yes, no, no, yes, maybe, no, maybe

Date06:58:55, January 07, 2006 CET
From Federation Under Crazy Killers -- United
ToDebating the Common Sense Health Reforms Act
MessagePlease do these more separately.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 152

no
    

Total Seats: 87

abstain
 

Total Seats: 16


Random fact: The players in a nation have a collective responsibility to ensure their "Bills under debate" section is kept in good order. Bills which are irrelevant or have become irrelevant should be deleted. Deletion can be requested for bills proposed by inactive parties on the Bill Clearout Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4363

Random quote: "For every action there is an equal and opposite government program." - Bob Wells

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 113