Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5461
Next month in: 03:06:19
Server time: 12:53:40, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Family and Capitalism Bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: Pnték Prsakij Prta (Phalangists)

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 2167

Description[?]:

A bill aiming at freeing the market and supporting the family.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:40:34, January 05, 2006 CET
FromOne Nation Conservative Party
ToDebating the Family and Capitalism Bill
Message5 and 6 have been proposed by FHP. We will support 15, 14, 4 and 2 if they were separated into a different bill.

Date19:46:16, January 05, 2006 CET
FromSeeYainHell Party
ToDebating the Family and Capitalism Bill
Messagewow, what an onslaught! But I do like that Phalanx is back in the battle lines.

I'd support Article 18, private house ownership, the rest I am deaf to,

Date19:59:50, January 05, 2006 CET
FromPnték Prsakij Prta (Phalangists)
ToDebating the Family and Capitalism Bill
MessageYes, I know that Articles 5 and 6 have already been proposed, but there is so little capitalist legislation left to put to vote, so I had to add something. However we are expecting you to disagree, the Phalanx feels condemned to a lifetime in opposition, but that is life, we will continue to represent those Pontesians who are proud of their nation and religion.

Date21:52:15, January 05, 2006 CET
FromOne Nation Conservative Party
ToDebating the Family and Capitalism Bill
MessageI like the look of some of these proposals, once you send this to vote and if it doesn't succede, I'll cherry-pick it and make my own bill.

Date23:09:20, January 05, 2006 CET
FromSeeYainHell Party
ToDebating the Family and Capitalism Bill
MessageTribaction has no end in praise for the Phalanx in this tough time for those conservative Pontesians, but remember that the Nationalist's voters are looking for you in the next election.

Date19:59:41, January 06, 2006 CET
FromFriedrich Hayek Party
ToDebating the Family and Capitalism Bill
MessageThe Phalanx Party has asked for it by refusing to split off bills. They will now get a capitalist bill with progressive features thrown at them, they can either screw their capitalist credentials or their family ones

Date20:04:55, January 06, 2006 CET
FromPnték Prsakij Prta (Phalangists)
ToDebating the Family and Capitalism Bill
MessageFHP, you never asked us to split of bills. I refuse to split of bills, because I cannot be bothered to make several single issue bills, your pettiness is alarming and hardly seems fitting for a serious political party.

Date20:14:34, January 06, 2006 CET
FromFriedrich Hayek Party
ToDebating the Family and Capitalism Bill
MessageYou refuse to split off bills, that i know, i didnt ask because it wouldnt of made a difference as you havent done it in the past.

Date20:24:07, January 06, 2006 CET
FromFriedrich Hayek Party
ToDebating the Family and Capitalism Bill
MessageSerious political party? Says someone who voted for all kinds of regulatory measures with the Nationalists and then swtiches to capitalism, you have no clear commitment to capitalism, you only want to be capitalist due to wanting to garner votes there.

The FHP has a commitment to free and unrestricted capitalism in almost all areas as well as a liberal social agenda, we have always voted that way. You have not and you flip flop more than John Kerry ever did

Date21:13:51, January 06, 2006 CET
FromSeeYainHell Party
ToDebating the Family and Capitalism Bill
Messageyeah phalanx you alternate between edged captialism and sharp democratic socialism (socialism as in society-first, as used in Democratic Socialists) like Casanova, seducting both genders according to convienance! You may get your voters thinking that you were of one particularlity, but the more educated among them will refute this.

Date23:10:32, January 06, 2006 CET
FromPontesi Imperial Alliance
ToDebating the Family and Capitalism Bill
MessageWe can only support articles 1, 9, 10, 13, 16, and 17, and then only with reservations about most of them. This bill is too omnibus.

Date23:30:30, January 07, 2006 CET
From Pnték Znkak Prta 'Bastardry'
ToDebating the Family and Capitalism Bill
Message1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 13, 14, 16, and 19 are absolutely deplorable due to their disregard for well-being in the name of expanding profits, or imposing one ethical code on a mixed culture that may choose to adopt such policies for their personal lives if they believe in them themselves. These proposals for state regulations of personal freedom based on narrow minds combined with a promotion of irresponsibility will not be supported by Kurui. Education is also hampered by this and this reflects poorly on the Phalanx Party for it's suggestions.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 23

no
     

Total Seats: 61

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Don't vote yes on a cabinet coalition that doesn't give you the power that you deserve.

    Random quote: "The only stable state is the one in which all men are equal before the law." - Aristotle

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 173