Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5474
Next month in: 03:18:00
Server time: 00:41:59, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): SocDemDundorfian | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Prisoner Policy Ammendment

Details

Submitted by[?]: We Say So! Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2054

Description[?]:

In order that those found guilty of crime re-pay a debt to society, and provide a product from their incarceration, they will be provided with work to carry out, without payment as part of their rehabilitation. However, their financial position outside of prison will be put on hold (they will pay no tax) and, upon their release (should they be released) they will be provided with work, based around that which they have been doing within their prison term, as well as housing on a limited contract until they can provide fully for themselves again.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date00:06:25, May 17, 2005 CET
From Socialist Party
ToDebating the Prisoner Policy Ammendment
MessageWe strongly oppose this neo-liberal measure !!!
Prisoners working for free will make maximum exploitation - and it will put a negative pressure on the wages of all of the working class. It is in the best interest of the working class this proposal gets rejected !!!

Date08:19:06, May 17, 2005 CET
From United Blobs
ToDebating the Prisoner Policy Ammendment
MessageWe strongly oppose this as well! It is exploiting prisoners and reduces them to little more than slaves. We urge all sensible parties to stand up against this legislation.

Date14:31:27, May 17, 2005 CET
From We Say So! Party
ToDebating the Prisoner Policy Ammendment
MessageThey're in prison! The cost to the prison service maintaining these prisons is extremely high, and then we are paying these individuals as well? Its madness! We are all for supporting the re-education of offenders and providing them with liveable conditions whilst they are under incarceration and we have also introduced a clause that protects these prisoners once they are released. All we ask in return is that these prisoners provide some form of payment to the state for the cost of operating these prisons. The type of work carried out by these prisoners can be discussed, we are open to all options, however as the law stands they can, if they wish, do nothing throughout their entire incarceration, with nothing being done to repay any debt to society, and are then released with no support whatsoever. This ammendment covers all these positions, and it is the position of the WSS!P that this ammendment is a requirement in order to strengthen the position of the prison service.

Date15:18:58, May 17, 2005 CET
From People's Party of Oppressive Liberation
ToDebating the Prisoner Policy Ammendment
MessagePrisoners will not be working for free. They will be working to pay for rent, food and clothing. The idea that the people of the nation must pay for the upkeep of these individuals, non-productive crimals, is an outrange and injustice. Further, the responsiblity of a regular job is an excelent educational and rehabilitational tool.

Date21:20:04, May 17, 2005 CET
From National Imperial Hobrazian Front
ToDebating the Prisoner Policy Ammendment
MessageAdd a clause that states that the prescribed jobs will give them skills that will benefit them in the workplace upon release and we will support. This could be a valuable law only on the condition that it better serves the best interest of the prisoner. The purpose of incarceration is to rehabilitate criminals so that they can properly function in a civilized society.

Date01:58:15, May 18, 2005 CET
From We Say So! Party
ToDebating the Prisoner Policy Ammendment
MessageBill modified.

Date22:36:48, May 18, 2005 CET
From Socialist Party
ToDebating the Prisoner Policy Ammendment
MessageThe maintenance of the buildings (not security items), the cloth and the food can be reducted from the wage they would normally get, but the rest they should receive !!!

Camera's, security items and the payment of guards should be done by the state.

We believe they should have a choice in whatever job they do, but that they are obliged to work "if it would be ideal cicumstances". The reality is that so many more people are not used in the production process, we have way too many jobless people and we should offer them jobs first. In fact, we plea for the reducing of the working week as such will allow involve more people in the production process.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 236

no
  

Total Seats: 88

abstain
  

Total Seats: 74


Random fact: In cases where players have failed to clearly and accurately reference their nation's RP laws in the "Bills under debate" section, Moderation will rule them invalid if a challenge is made to their validity.

Random quote: "Politics is all about compromises and negotiations, nothing more, nothing less." - Augusto Amadeo, former Istalian politician

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 68