We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Retirement Protection Plan
Details
Submitted by[?]: National Imperial Hobrazian Front
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2054
Description[?]:
| The nation currently has too high of a retirement age, which I believe most of us can agree on. For the best interest of the working class, we propose that the retirement age be set to 65 years. This is neither too young nor too old. The person may continue working if they so desire, but a full pension will be provided at 65. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The professional retirement age.
Old value:: 70
Current: 75
Proposed: 65
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 04:07:39, May 17, 2005 CET | From |  National Imperial Hobrazian Front | To | Debating the Retirement Protection Plan |
| Message | Previous attempts at lowering this were a bit extreme. However, I believe that 65 is an appropriate age for this to be set at. This way the working class is protected without cutting out able-bodied individuals that still wish to work into their golden years. |
| Date | 13:09:42, May 17, 2005 CET | From | We Say So! Party | To | Debating the Retirement Protection Plan |
| Message | We agree. This new age is much more preferable. |
| Date | 15:20:02, May 17, 2005 CET | From | People's Party of Oppressive Liberation | To | Debating the Retirement Protection Plan |
| Message | No. We do not support forcing able bodied workers to leave the job force before they wish too. |
| Date | 15:32:39, May 17, 2005 CET | From | We Say So! Party | To | Debating the Retirement Protection Plan |
| Message | Perhaps there should be a clause stating that at this point people may retire, with a full pention, if they wish or they may continue working as they did before? |
| Date | 15:45:38, May 17, 2005 CET | From | People's Party of Oppressive Liberation | To | Debating the Retirement Protection Plan |
| Message | We would find that acceptable. |
| Date | 16:30:16, May 17, 2005 CET | From | Socialist Party | To | Debating the Retirement Protection Plan |
| Message | Though we believe it should be even lower, we will support this as it is a step into the direction I want to see it. We object to the PPOL's reasonings, as certain managers and stuff always work till a higher age than state pension and such, but the age of 70 enforces many people to work until they are seventy years old, if they want to have a living, which I believe is way too old. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 398 | |||||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | |||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: In Particracy players are only allowed to play as one party at a time. Want to swap nations? Inactivate your current party and make a new one! Want to return? Request Moderation to reactivate your party on the forum! |
| Random quote: "He who wishes to be obeyed must know how to command." - Niccolo Machiavelli |