Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5471
Next month in: 03:12:31
Server time: 08:47:28, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): AethanKal | albaniansunited | burgerboys | itsjustgav | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of May 3795: Alternative

Details

Submitted by[?]: Communist Party of Solentia (CPS)

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 3796

Description[?]:

We don't think that a cabinet where one party can not agree with the posts it get is a stable government. We are willing to compromise with Unionists.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date11:50:29, February 02, 2015 CET
FromCommunist Party of Solentia (CPS)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of May 3795: Alternative
MessageBecause all the internal conflicts in a not yet formed coalition were because CNP didn't agree with proposal terms, we suggest this as the solution. Replaced CNP with SDP.

RCS, we think it's better that you take Finance ministry, while we take health and social services.

Date14:31:53, February 03, 2015 CET
FromRadical Republican Party (RRP)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of May 3795: Alternative
MessageRCS's parliamentary group voted to support this coalition.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 148

no
 

Total Seats: 58

abstain
  

Total Seats: 19


Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context.

Random quote: "Entrepreneurs are simply those who understand that there is little difference between obstacle and opportunity and are able to turn both to their advantage." - Niccolo Machiavelli

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 48