We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Defense Commune 2167
Details
Submitted by[?]: Left Communist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2169
Description[?]:
| The SNP intends to place the defense industry under government control. This will allow our nation to prepare its defenses quicker and faster, give the munitions workers a fairer deal and more freedom, and also to remove the barbaric practice of helping to spill blood for cash. Our intention is to eventually place all major industries under government control. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The nation's defence industry.
Old value:: Defence industries are privately owned and not subsidised.
Current: The state owns national defence industries but these exist alongside privately owned defence industries.
Proposed: The state owns all defence industries.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 01:36:14, January 07, 2006 CET | From | National Imperial Hobrazian Front | To | Debating the Defense Commune 2167 |
| Message | I like the more aggressive former EUP. What do we call you now? SNP? |
| Date | 02:59:28, January 07, 2006 CET | From | Left Communist Party | To | Debating the Defense Commune 2167 |
| Message | Yup, I'm the SNP now. |
| Date | 03:01:14, January 07, 2006 CET | From | Left Communist Party | To | Debating the Defense Commune 2167 |
| Message | I'll let more debate run... once I know I've got support (which'll be hard for this bill I think) I'll send this one rolling. |
| Date | 03:01:35, January 07, 2006 CET | From | Left Communist Party | To | Debating the Defense Commune 2167 |
| Message | I'm creating a lot of bills presently to rapidly change my image. |
| Date | 12:31:46, January 07, 2006 CET | From | United Blobs | To | Debating the Defense Commune 2167 |
| Message | We keep our no vote. |
| Date | 00:09:55, January 08, 2006 CET | From | Capitalizt Party | To | Debating the Defense Commune 2167 |
| Message | ALL defence industries? No, no. |
| Date | 12:27:43, January 08, 2006 CET | From | We Say So! Party | To | Debating the Defense Commune 2167 |
| Message | No to this one. A balanced economy allows for both, not one or the other. |
| Date | 00:45:46, January 10, 2006 CET | From | Hobrazian Peoples Party | To | Debating the Defense Commune 2167 |
| Message | read the thread in the forum. This is because of the upcoming conflict. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 158 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 242 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: All role-play must respect the established cultural background in Culturally Protected nations. |
| Random quote: "The communist revolution is the most radical rupture with traditional property relations; no wonder that its development involves the most radical rupture with traditional ideas." - Karl Marx |