We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Slander laws policy
Details
Submitted by[?]: Communist Party of Solentia (CPS)
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 3808
Description[?]:
| The definition of a "defamatory opinion" is too verbose to be used in the law while it is possible to strictly prove falthity of the information. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Slander laws.
Old value:: Individuals may sue over falsehoods and defamatory opinions spoken about them, if judged to be malicious.
Current: Individuals may sue over falsehoods and defamatory opinions spoken about them, if judged to be malicious.
Proposed: Individuals may sue over malicious falsehoods spoken about them.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 18:25:05, February 26, 2015 CET | From | Free Democratic Party | To | Debating the Slander laws policy |
| Message | "We praise the SDP for attempting to restore freedom of speech in our great nation. The courts or government should have no involvement in my opinion or negative statement about another person." ~William Paul, Secondary Chairman of the LCC |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 425 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: In general, role-play requires the consent of all players. |
| Random quote: "If God made man they say Sam Colt made them equal." - Unknown |