Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 4350
Next month in: 03:12:53
Server time: 00:47:06, February 18, 2018 CET
Currently online (16): 6ix | Alexak | Almenar99 | andresvivasg | Capitalist3000 | EdmundSB | Farsun | JamieBradshaw | Koba98 | Larry Paulson | marc6788 | NoodlesI8 | Ropstens väktare | Tecktonik Pyro | Tiberius | Wigan96 | Record: 63 on 23:28:53, August 06, 2007 CET

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of October 3809

Details

Submitted by[?]: Lodamese Nationalist Committee

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 3810

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date05:18:22, March 03, 2015 CET
FromFederal Liberal Congress
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of October 3809
MessageMr. Speaker,

We support this proposal and are excited to work with our colleagues in returning Lodamun to its splendor.

Francis M. Jones V
FLC Chairman

Date05:19:33, March 03, 2015 CET
From Great National Republican Guard
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of October 3809
MessageMr. Speaker,

My party supports this proposal.

--

Andre Fertig,
Chairman of the GNRG

Date15:21:07, March 03, 2015 CET
FromPeople of Freedom (P.F)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of October 3809
MessageMr. Speaker.

We support this coalition government.

Don Lieberman
Deputy Leader

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 332

no
  

Total Seats: 267

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: As a general convention, players should be able to provide good reasons if they want to significantly change Cultural Protocols which are less than 30 in-game years old. Where the Cultural Protocols are more than 30 in-game years old, then a change to any of the categories by 5% or less will generally be accepted without question. If the changes proposed are between 5 and 10%, then players should be prepared for the possibility of having the changes queried. If the changes proposed are over 10%, then players should always expect to need to provide strong role-play justification for the changes. Changes of over 15% will never be accepted, unless there are exceptional circumstances where this is deemed necessary to repair a situation in which a Cultural Protocol is insufficiently accessible to players.

    Random quote: "The use of solar energy has not been opened up because the oil industry does not own the sun." - Ralph Nader

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 54