We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Sports Club Funding Reform
Details
Submitted by[?]: Federal Green Party (FGP)
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 3812
Description[?]:
| We see no reason to ban local governments from funding sports clubs. If they wish to do so then they should be able to, without interference from the national government. This could be especially important for sports clubs of our youth, who could benefit immensely from it. After all, instead of being on the streets they would be on the field getting exercise and learning important team skills! |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The funding of sports clubs.
Old value:: The government does not fund sports clubs; only private ones are allowed.
Current: The government funds some sports clubs side-by-side with private ones.
Proposed: Local governments decide the funding policy of sports clubs.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 12:53:07, March 06, 2015 CET | From |  Communist Party of Solentia (CPS) | To | Debating the Sports Club Funding Reform |
| Message | We argee with articles 1, 2, 4 only. Julia Wise, Chairperson of SDP |
| Date | 16:41:27, March 06, 2015 CET | From | Free Democratic Party | To | Debating the Sports Club Funding Reform |
| Message | "The only article we disagree with is article 4. We shall accept it." ~Ted Johnson, Head Chairman of the LCC |
| Date | 16:52:43, March 06, 2015 CET | From | Federal Green Party (FGP) | To | Debating the Sports Club Funding Reform |
| Message | We are happy to hear of your support! It is unfortunate that you do not agree with that article. What the Reform Option wishes to clarify is that this bill will not ban drugs, simply regulate them as we do with alcohol. It is unfortunate that we cannot get your support SDP. If this bill was to fail then we shall propose another bill with articles 1 and 2 since it appears both you and the ruling LCC are supporters of that part of the Platform. May we ask why you believe private schools should remain banned? If someone has the money for it shouldn't they be able to send their child to a private school of their choice? Note this would not effect public school funding in any way. |
| Date | 17:49:35, March 06, 2015 CET | From | Free Democratic Party | To | Debating the Sports Club Funding Reform |
| Message | "Article 1 is our second least favorite. We are only accepting it here because article 5, 6, and 7 are so good. I as an individual love article 1, but the general thought of our party is that article 1 isn't the best. Just wait it out and see if the CNP, the Unionists, or the NLP accept it." ~Ted Johnson, Head Chairman of the LCC |
| Date | 19:47:22, March 06, 2015 CET | From | Coalition for National Unity [CNU] | To | Debating the Sports Club Funding Reform |
| Message | "The Unionists oppose most of these articles and can find no logical reason for them to be in the same piece of legislation." Astryd Goldsea, Foreign Secretary Unionist Acting Legislative Lead |
| Date | 20:00:50, March 06, 2015 CET | From | Federal Green Party (FGP) | To | Debating the Sports Club Funding Reform |
| Message | Which Articles do you support, Unionists? Please let us know so that we can attempt to propose a bill with the Articles that everyone here can live with. |
| Date | 20:01:11, March 06, 2015 CET | From | Radical Republican Party (RRP) | To | Debating the Sports Club Funding Reform |
| Message | It would be better if thia bill were to be broken down to perhaps 3-4 bills with common topics. It would be easier to support the legislation you agree with then. Adam Reed NLP chairman |
| Date | 20:01:28, March 06, 2015 CET | From | Radical Republican Party (RRP) | To | Debating the Sports Club Funding Reform |
| Message | It would be better if thia bill were to be broken down to perhaps 3-4 bills with common topics. It would be easier to support the legislation you agree with then. Adam Reed NLP chairman |
| Date | 20:01:40, March 06, 2015 CET | From | Federal Green Party (FGP) | To | Debating the Sports Club Funding Reform |
| Message | Would all parties agree with Article 2 if it was proposed by itself? |
| Date | 20:02:37, March 06, 2015 CET | From | Federal Green Party (FGP) | To | Debating the Sports Club Funding Reform |
| Message | Thank you for your input NLP. Which Articles do you agree with? Then we can have them voted on individually and achieve success where we have agreement. |
| Date | 20:25:03, March 06, 2015 CET | From | Radical Republican Party (RRP) | To | Debating the Sports Club Funding Reform |
| Message | We support all articles about decentralizations, Adam Reed NLP chairman |
| Date | 20:44:05, March 06, 2015 CET | From | Coalition for National Unity [CNU] | To | Debating the Sports Club Funding Reform |
| Message | "We support Articles 1 and 2." Ala-ad-Din ibn Haroun al-Fulan, Unionist Legislative Lead |
| Date | 21:50:53, March 06, 2015 CET | From | Federal Green Party (FGP) | To | Debating the Sports Club Funding Reform |
| Message | Thank you very much for your responses! We shall propose separate bills in the future that cover our areas of agreement. Everyone appears to be happy with Article 2. If anyone wishes to propose such a bill then the Reform Option would certainly support it. Otherwise we shall make such a proposal sometime in the future. Vesse Jentura, Head Speaker of the Reform Option Council |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 425 | ||||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Dorvik is a nation based on Germanic and old Prussian cultures, it is located on the far north of Artania, making it an almost arctic nation. |
| Random quote: "Rifles, muskets, long-bows and hand-grenades are inherently democratic weapons. A complex weapon makes the strong stronger, while a simple weapon so long as there is no answer to it gives claws to the weak." - George Orwell |