We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Protection of Marriage Act
Details
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 3818
Description[?]:
| . |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy with respect to adultery.
Old value:: There is no explicit government policy on adultery.
Current: Adultery is a capital offence.
Proposed: Adultery is illegal, but not prosecuted.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The legality of divorces (if marriages are recognised).
Old value:: The legality of divorces is left up to the local governments.
Current: Divorces are only legal with grounded cause (such as adultery, or violence).
Proposed: Divorces are only legal with grounded cause (such as adultery, or violence).
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 17:26:31, March 14, 2015 CET | From |  Free Democratic Party | To | Debating the Protection of Marriage Act |
| Message | "The prostituion part alone is terrible." ~Ted Johnson, Head Chairman of the LPS |
| Date | 01:36:01, March 15, 2015 CET | From | Free Democratic Party | To | Debating the Protection of Marriage Act |
| Message | "Now this is an anti-civil liberty bill? EVEN WORSE." ~Ted Johnson, Head Chairman of the LPS |
| Date | 01:38:48, March 15, 2015 CET | From | SUN | To | Debating the Protection of Marriage Act |
| Message | Wouldn't prostitution be a matter of civil liberty to a libertarian? The sacred freedom to sell one's body on the open market ? |
| Date | 02:20:51, March 15, 2015 CET | From | Free Democratic Party | To | Debating the Protection of Marriage Act |
| Message | "Yes. We realized you removed the prostitution regulation section, but articles 1 and 2 really made us angry." ~Ted Johnson, Head Chairman of the LPS |
| Date | 19:15:08, March 15, 2015 CET | From | Federal Green Party (FGP) | To | Debating the Protection of Marriage Act |
| Message | OOC: https://scontent-dfw.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpf1/v/t1.0-9/11025114_10153089919758810_311066125107474565_n.jpg?oh=868132e14e8f4994736fd6bb027e2ecf&oe=557A7203 |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 197 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 300 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 28 |
| Random fact: Particracy does not allow role-play that seems to belong to the world of fantasy, science fiction and futuristic speculation. |
| Random quote: "I bet their mothers don't love them. Many Trigunian women are so cold. I mean it's a racist hellhole in parts." - Tirza Sommer, former Dorvish politician |