Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 5472
Next month in: 00:50:10
Server time: 03:09:49, April 20, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): dnobb | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Freedom Party-proposed Cabinet Reshuffle of October 2167

Details

Submitted by[?]: Radical Freedom Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 2168

Description[?]:

An exact copy of the Freedom Party bill: http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=42462

With the GRP inactive it is inactive that Rutania gains a fully functional government post-haste.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date16:31:27, January 07, 2006 CET
From Freedom Party
ToDebating the Freedom Party-proposed Cabinet Reshuffle of October 2167
MessageYou should of sent this to vote when GRP is inactivated as this still wont pass unless an opposition party votes for it

Date16:43:16, January 07, 2006 CET
FromRadical Freedom Party
ToDebating the Freedom Party-proposed Cabinet Reshuffle of October 2167
MessageOOC: WTF... I thought they already had been inactivated. My bad.

Date17:17:46, January 07, 2006 CET
FromRadical Freedom Party
ToDebating the Freedom Party-proposed Cabinet Reshuffle of October 2167
MessageI implore the parties not in this cabinet to be reasonable and recognise that this bill merely presents a reshuffle of positions within the current government. It is also important to note that the government holds a de-facto majority in parliament, and that the GRP is nominally a part of government even if their MPs are incapacitated.

It is in the interest of all Rutanians that this important reshuffle take place, and I implore all parties to look beyond party political games and support this proposal.

Date19:43:39, January 07, 2006 CET
FromConservative Party
ToDebating the Freedom Party-proposed Cabinet Reshuffle of October 2167
MessageReasonable?


A reasonable solution would be to dissolve the government and call for new elections.

Date03:54:19, January 08, 2006 CET
FromNationalist Party
ToDebating the Freedom Party-proposed Cabinet Reshuffle of October 2167
MessageIndeed Conservatives.
Why should the Majority become slient becuase of the Power hungery "Freedom" Parties.
Power to the Peoples! Power to the Federated States.
Nationalist Party calls for an Early Election, or a REAL cabinet proposal

Date20:32:17, January 08, 2006 CET
FromGrand Republican Party
ToDebating the Freedom Party-proposed Cabinet Reshuffle of October 2167
MessageOOC: Well, crud. My harddrive crashed, so this happens. Could we have some new elections please?

Date22:50:20, January 08, 2006 CET
FromRadical Freedom Party
ToDebating the Freedom Party-proposed Cabinet Reshuffle of October 2167
MessageOOC: I'd be all for new elections but there is a shitload of proposals at vote now and they'll pass if all goes well. And after that eight month term we'll be having elections anyway. IMO waiting is the preferred option, or we'll have to vote again on all these bills.

Date09:21:24, January 09, 2006 CET
FromLiberal Imperialist Party
ToDebating the Freedom Party-proposed Cabinet Reshuffle of October 2167
MessageOOC: I agree with RFP... it would be too much of an inconvenience considering the new elections are pretty close anyway.

Date10:01:35, January 09, 2006 CET
FromGrand Republican Party
ToDebating the Freedom Party-proposed Cabinet Reshuffle of October 2167
MessageOOC: Hmmm, yes, this is indeed true. Let us await, then

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 318

no
   

Total Seats: 229

abstain
 

Total Seats: 52


Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life brand names (eg. Coca Cola, McDonalds, Microsoft). However, in the case of military equipment brand names it is permitted to use simple number-letter combinations (eg. T-90 and F-22) borrowed from real life, and also simple generic names, like those of animals (eg. Leopard and Jaguar).

Random quote: "The most radical revolutionary will become a conservative the day after the revolution." - Hannah Arendt

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 75