We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Pornographic Material Regulatory Standards
Details
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 3818
Description[?]:
SEC. I Article 1 amends earlier legislation to enforce general regulatory standards on the pornography and sex industry. Pornographic magazines, videos, and other related merchandise: 1) may not be sold to minors, 2) when sold in the public be displayed in a place away from the view and reach of children and, |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy with respect to the production of pornography.
Old value:: The production of pornography is treated as any other business.
Current: Pornography may not be produced in the nation.
Proposed: The production of pornography is legal, but regulated.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 04:28:58, March 19, 2015 CET | From | Free Democratic Party | To | Debating the Pornographic Material Regulatory Standards |
Message | "Porn is devastationaly harmful to minors. We believe that restricting its sales is still bad, though." ~Donny Kennedy, Secondary Chairman of the LPS |
Date | 04:37:10, March 19, 2015 CET | From | SUN | To | Debating the Pornographic Material Regulatory Standards |
Message | Which is worse, devastating harm to minors or restricting sales of something harmful? |
Date | 19:26:10, March 19, 2015 CET | From | Federal Green Party (FGP) | To | Debating the Pornographic Material Regulatory Standards |
Message | I have to disagree with my friend Donny Kennedy. I don't believe that porn is harmful for minors or anyone else. There are exceptions, of course, if it is very hardcore stuff or extreme fetishes. But regular porn depicting sex between two people? I fail to see how this is harmful to anyone. Oh no, people are having sex! Call the cops. In that case, is it harmful for children to see two monkeys having sex when they go to the zoo? Nature is not something that is dangerous or harmful, it is beautiful. -Christy Bell, Head Speaker of the Reform Option Council |
Date | 01:42:30, March 20, 2015 CET | From | Free Democratic Party | To | Debating the Pornographic Material Regulatory Standards |
Message | "It's harmful. It makes real sex less enjoyable, and it's as addictive as soft drugs. With that said, porn shouldn't be something that is regulated by the government because it's unenforcible, and people have different opinions on it. My friend Ted Johnson doesn't think it's harmful. Also, government shouldn't regulate people's personal lives." ~Donny Kennedy, Secondary Chairman of the LPS |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 225 | |||
no | Total Seats: 300 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Any RP law granting extraordinary "emergency powers" or dictator-like powers to a government must be passed by at least a 2/3rds majority, but (like all RP laws) may always be overturned by a simple majority vote of the legislature. |
Random quote: "Presidency, n. The greased pig in the field game of American politics." - Ambrose Bierce |