Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5471
Next month in: 02:39:26
Server time: 13:20:33, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (6): aai14 | AethanKal | Dx6743 | GLNBei | hexaus18 | SocDemDundorfian | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: New Republic Amendments

Details

Submitted by[?]: Free Democratic Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 3819

Description[?]:

"Progress is key. As time goes by, the power of the few should decrease while the power of the many increases. We need bigger parliament to enforce this ideal."

~Ted Johnson, Head chairman of the LPS and Prime Minister

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date18:52:04, March 20, 2015 CET
FromCoalition for National Unity [CNU]
ToDebating the New Republic Amendments
Message"The Senate is bloated as it is thanks to your wanton destruction of our constitution. No."

Astryd Goldsea, Unionist Leader

Date20:43:06, March 20, 2015 CET
FromFederal Green Party (FGP)
ToDebating the New Republic Amendments
MessageMore representatives means each citizen has a bigger say in their republic. Who would be against that?

Rather than having 120 thousand citizens per representative we would see 80 thousand per representative (for example). This means that each citizen now has a greater say in their nation. Why be opposed to greater powers for the people?

-Chris "Kid" Coltson, Public Speaker of the Reform Option

Date00:49:16, March 21, 2015 CET
FromCoalition for National Unity [CNU]
ToDebating the New Republic Amendments
Message"More representatives means the breaking up of communities into separate constituencies for no purpose other than the Unionists favour 425 as a value, so the LPS want to reach as far away from that as possible to prove their non-Unionist credentials. Their entire platform is based on being anti-Unionist rather than being for anything.

We oppose not based on some (questionable) argument about the proportion of citizens per vote but on the fact that our communities have been communally represented by the 425 constituencies for a thousand years...they are being broken up for no reason."

Astryd Goldsea, Unionist Leader

Date00:32:32, March 22, 2015 CET
FromFederal Green Party (FGP)
ToDebating the New Republic Amendments
MessageCommunities change all the time. Anything that lasted for a thousand years is LONG overdue for a change.

-Chris "Kid" Coltson, Public Speaker of the Reform Option

Date00:39:47, March 22, 2015 CET
FromSUN
ToDebating the New Republic Amendments
MessageWe propose 100

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 244

no
   

Total Seats: 225

abstain
  

Total Seats: 56


Random fact: Particracy does not allow role-play that seems to belong to the world of fantasy, science fiction and futuristic speculation.

Random quote: "Let's call the drug war what it is, ethnic cleansing of Americans." - Jello Biafra

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 53