Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5460
Next month in: 03:34:44
Server time: 12:25:15, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): Dioskouros | h48191 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Solentian Industrial & Commercial Emergency Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: SUN

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 3826

Description[?]:

This order by Parliament places the entirety of industry and commerce of the Republic of Solentia and all foreign assets in the Republic into public stewardship following a comprehensive review.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date00:58:17, March 30, 2015 CET
From Free Democratic Party
ToDebating the Solentian Industrial & Commercial Emergency Act
Message"At least the SUN is ideologically consistent, and I also feel they are honest."

~Donny Kennedy, Youth Outreach Director of the LPS and Minister of Internal Affairs

Date14:59:57, March 30, 2015 CET
From Federal Green Party (FGP)
ToDebating the Solentian Industrial & Commercial Emergency Act
MessageWait, you yourself pushed to make the stock market private but regulated. Why the sudden change of heart? And why should all industry be owned and operated by the state?

Date15:42:32, March 30, 2015 CET
From Free Democratic Party
ToDebating the Solentian Industrial & Commercial Emergency Act
Message"The SUN is not ideologically consistent! They changed their bill since Donny said that!"

~Amy Smith, Secondary Chairman of the LPS

Date19:11:38, March 30, 2015 CET
From Federal Green Party (FGP)
ToDebating the Solentian Industrial & Commercial Emergency Act
MessageI just don't see how anyone could justify the state owning everything. This means if I wish to open my own business, including a worker-owned and managed one, I would be shut down and have my business taken from me.

How would that benefit anyone in Solentia? If we want to talk about breaking up monopolies and oligopolies then the FGRP is right there with you, but to nationalize everything doesn't make sense nor is it based on any arguments based off reason or logic. What justification is there for it and how would it improve our nation?

Date19:14:03, March 30, 2015 CET
From Free Democratic Party
ToDebating the Solentian Industrial & Commercial Emergency Act
Message"It wouldn't improve our nation."

~Ted Johnson, Head chairman of the LPS and Prime Minister

Date23:40:32, March 30, 2015 CET
From Federal Green Party (FGP)
ToDebating the Solentian Industrial & Commercial Emergency Act
MessageYes, I agree. This is obviously the case. I was directing my question towards the SUN Party, since they proposed this.

Date21:23:25, April 04, 2015 CET
From Coalition for National Unity [CNU]
ToDebating the Solentian Industrial & Commercial Emergency Act
Message"The Unionists are deeply opposed to Articles 1, 2, 5 and 6."

Astyrd Goldsea, Unionist Leader

Date23:53:16, April 04, 2015 CET
From Liberal Democrats
ToDebating the Solentian Industrial & Commercial Emergency Act
MessageI'm opposed to article 1, 3-7

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 135

no
      

Total Seats: 230

abstain
 

Total Seats: 160


Random fact: Real-life organisations should not be referenced in Particracy, unless they are simple and generic (eg. "National Organisation for Women" is allowed).

Random quote: "The first step in freeing yourself from social restrictions is the realization that there is no such thing as a 'safe' code of conduct, one that would earn everyone's approval. Your actions can always be condemned by someone, for being too bold or too apathetic, for being too conformist or too nonconformist, for being too liberal or too conservative. So it's necessary to decide whose approval is important to you." - Harry Browne

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 94