We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Devolution Act 3829
Details
Submitted by[?]: Social-Federalist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 3831
Description[?]:
| Our party believes that the individual regions of this country should have more power over themselves so that local governments, who know their specific regions better than any central government can, will be able to make more sensible and appropriate decisions in their region. But we need your help to pass this bill and let the regions have a greater voice over how they are run. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's position towards the administration of law.
Old value:: There are regional courts, but decisions of regional courts may be appealed to national courts (if the right to appeal exists).
Current: There are regional courts that have jurisdiction over questions of regional law and national courts that have jurisdiction over questions of national law.
Proposed: There are regional courts that have jurisdiction over questions of regional law and national courts that have jurisdiction over questions of national law.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy towards daily working hours.
Old value:: The government has no policy concerning daily working hours.
Current: Daily working hours are regulated by the government.
Proposed: Local governments regulates the daily working hours.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 20:14:25, April 12, 2015 CET | From | National Democratic Party | To | Debating the Devolution Act 3829 |
| Message | I'm seeing nothing in this bill. 1) Article 3 has direct connection with central government. So It should be treated by central government. 2) According to Your proposal in Aritcle 4 you are trying to say government may seize private properties. This country is federal democratic country and our country is not ruling by the king or dictators. So my party will not support this bill. |
| Date | 21:48:56, April 13, 2015 CET | From | Social-Federalist Party | To | Debating the Devolution Act 3829 |
| Message | Very well then. We will remove those two proposals, which I admit weren't thought out very well, but the real backbone of our bill will remain. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |
| yes | Total Seats: 12 | |
| no | Total Seats: 152 | |
| abstain | Total Seats: 286 |
| Random fact: The players in a nation have a collective responsibility to ensure their "Bills under debate" section is kept in good order. Bills which are irrelevant or have become irrelevant should be deleted. Deletion can be requested for bills proposed by inactive parties on the Bill Clearout Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4363 |
| Random quote: "Civil disobedience. . . is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience. Our problem is that numbers of people all over the world have obeyed the dictates of the leaders of their government and have gone to war, and millions have been killed because of this obedience. . Our problem is that people are obedient all over the world in the face of poverty and starvation and stupidity, and war, and cruelty. Our problem is that people are obedient while the jails are full of petty thieves, and all the while the grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem." - Howard Zinn |