Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5471
Next month in: 01:15:43
Server time: 10:44:16, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): AethanKal | itsjustgav | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of July 3830

Details

Submitted by[?]: Free Democratic Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 3831

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet to keep the freedom coalition, but this will give the SUN control over the military. Hopefully this will be a viable option. Freedom Coalition members please state whether or not you would accept this.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date21:25:46, April 13, 2015 CET
FromFederal Green Party (FGP)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 3830
MessageSure, we would accept this proposal.

Date21:34:24, April 13, 2015 CET
FromCoalition for National Unity [CNU]
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 3830
Message"I thought you accused the SUN of working with Ahmadi terrorists? The constant change in the LPS position is ludicrous. They simply cannot be trusted."

Brock Ryaine, Unionist Leader

Date22:07:49, April 13, 2015 CET
FromFree Democratic Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 3830
Message"They have exhibited a battle strategy to defend against the terrorists. No party has done that besides them. Therefore, they deserve the role."

~Amy Smith, Secondary Chairman of the LPS

Date22:16:54, April 13, 2015 CET
FromCoalition for National Unity [CNU]
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 3830
Message"And next month, will you be spouting fresh conspiracy theories about your cabinet colleagues? This is why we avoid large coalitions where possible; they are prone to fickle political stunts and changing tides. There is no stability to be found."

Brock Ryaine, Unionist Leader

Date22:40:15, April 13, 2015 CET
FromFree Democratic Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 3830
Message"There is no Unionists, Chann, or NLP cabinet that would be smaller than this. The Unionists have the inability to count, as this is a very small cabinet."

~Amy Smith, Secondary Chairman of the LPS

Date22:43:51, April 13, 2015 CET
FromCoalition for National Unity [CNU]
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 3830
Message"The Unionists are not proposing a cabinet. We are criticising your fickle month-long political outlook and changes of style, tone and content. Four political parties sharing power is not a "small cabinet"."

Brock Ryaine, Unionist Leader

Date22:49:30, April 13, 2015 CET
FromFree Democratic Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 3830
Message"Give the number, then. Do you want two parties? Would you vote for a LPS-SUN cabinet? We can not possibly reject our SDP and Federalist friends!"

~Amy Smith, Secondary Chairman of the LPS

Date23:05:55, April 13, 2015 CET
FromCoalition for National Unity [CNU]
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 3830
Message"for years, the LPS have struggled to form working majority coalitions. This muddle and mess approach gets tiring for the public very quickly. What we propose is single party Government wherever practical and possible. That has been our position for hundreds of years and that continues to be the best solution for Solentia. This country, time and time again, has performed best whilst under a majority Unionist administration. That is our aim.

What the LPS offer is a messy here-and-there approach to governance with the Unionists in a proposal one day, the Channs the next, the SUN banned one week and welcomed the next. We can all see through it, we all know you are incompetent. It's time to give up the goose."

Brock Ryaine, Unionist Leader

Date23:08:56, April 13, 2015 CET
FromFree Democratic Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 3830
Message"We have had a three party cabinet for the past 15 years, and it's been great."

~Amy Smith, Secondary Chairman of the LPS

Date23:23:48, April 13, 2015 CET
FromCoalition for National Unity [CNU]
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 3830
Message"You ignored the death of thousands, let Ahmadi terrorists storm the northern borders, an entire city was captired by extremist rebels, destroyed our relationship with Kafuristan and ended any semblance of bipartisan politics in this country.
That was all whilst managing to think a Solentian city was in a foreign country and having to re-do your own budget twice because of counting mistakes. It has been 15 years of blunder after blunder."

Brock Ryaine, Unionist Leader

Date00:17:40, April 14, 2015 CET
FromChann National Party (CNP)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 3830
Message"WHILE ignoring that Chann forces had surrounded Ahmadi Terrorists and cut them off from supplies, yet they are quick to heap all the praise on SUN (we respect SUN, just not the way LPS describes the situation). Chann forces were the first to respond to the terrorists and frankly were more successful in fast response and had alienated teh Ahmadi terrorists while securing the other half of the city."

Samantha Chann

Date01:02:10, April 14, 2015 CET
FromFree Democratic Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 3830
Message"We never ignored the Channs. You are a 16 member party, and as the Unionists like to state, the cabinet should be small."

~Amy Smith, Secondary Chairman of the LPS

Date05:36:18, April 14, 2015 CET
FromSUN
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 3830
MessageWe appreciate the position in Defence; however, as largest party at the least we deserve PM or several cabinet positions weighed by our share of the vote.


Date06:39:13, April 14, 2015 CET
FromFederal Green Party (FGP)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 3830
MessageThat would be fine with us. You and the LPS could get the most seats, then the SDP and finally our party with the least seats in the cabinet. Given the voice of the electorate this appears to be the fairest option and would give this coalition a strong majority.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 222

no
   

Total Seats: 78

abstain
  

Total Seats: 225


Random fact: If you want to leave Particracy, please inactivate yourself on your user page to save the moderation team some time.

Random quote: "In politics, madame, you need two things: friends, but above all an enemy." - Brian Mulroney

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 75