We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ratification of the Treaty on Fair Punishment
Details
Submitted by[?]: Hosian Socialist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 3838
Description[?]:
This bill asks for the ratification of the <a href="viewtreaty.php?treatyid=3022">Treaty on Fair Punishment</a>. |
Proposals
Article 1
Ratify the Treaty on Fair Punishment.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 08:56:06, April 29, 2015 CET | From | Hosian Socialist Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty on Fair Punishment |
Message | Mr. Speaker, Let us join the other civilized societies of the world and help prevent such cruel and unusual practices from ever taking place in our country. I yield |
Date | 08:58:43, April 29, 2015 CET | From | Liberal Alliance | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty on Fair Punishment |
Message | Mr Speaker The LA support this. I yield. |
Date | 11:15:34, April 29, 2015 CET | From | Forward | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty on Fair Punishment |
Message | Mr Speaker. Arch can't support this. I yield |
Date | 12:53:21, April 29, 2015 CET | From | Choice | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty on Fair Punishment |
Message | We are strongly opposed to this and shall not vote yes. We hope other parties see the light and also vote against. |
Date | 16:02:45, April 29, 2015 CET | From | Hosian Socialist Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty on Fair Punishment |
Message | Mr. Speaker, We ask which provisions Arch and Choice are against. I yield |
Date | 16:10:56, April 29, 2015 CET | From | Choice | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty on Fair Punishment |
Message | All save for article 5. Choice are strong supporters of the death penalty. |
Date | 16:17:55, April 29, 2015 CET | From | Hosian Socialist Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty on Fair Punishment |
Message | Mr. Speaker, In this country we don't room for barbarians. I yield |
Date | 16:37:09, April 29, 2015 CET | From | Choice | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty on Fair Punishment |
Message | We believe strongly in the death penalty, some people are too dangerous to stay alive and quite frankly do not deserve to stay alive. |
Date | 17:46:09, April 29, 2015 CET | From | Forward | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty on Fair Punishment |
Message | Mr Speaker, "In this country we don't room for barbarians."- Just because a party believes in a death penalty doesn't make them "barbarians", we live in a diplomacy people are allowed to have their own opinion Hosian Socialist Party. We also too believe in a death penalty thus why we are against. I yield |
Date | 20:00:47, April 29, 2015 CET | From | Hosian Socialist Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty on Fair Punishment |
Message | Mr. Speaker, We don't live in a diplomacy we live in a democracy. I suggest we expedite the purchasing of the dictionaries. I yield |
Date | 21:50:13, April 29, 2015 CET | From | Choice | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty on Fair Punishment |
Message | Your comment completely contradicts every you have just said. "We don't live in a diplomacy, we live in a democracy". You are seeking more diplomatic relations with other countries. Meanwhile, so far the majority of the parties which have voted have voted against, so if you were a champion of democracy and truly believed that we live in a democracy and not a diplomacy, you would vote against this bill. Once again only the bottom three parties of the nation thus far have voted in favour of this bill, a nation with eight parties. |
Date | 22:21:38, April 29, 2015 CET | From | Hosian Socialist Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty on Fair Punishment |
Message | Mr. Speaker and all other Parties who are familiar with the language of this land I ask you all, can something help me explain the difference between a democracy and diplomacy to the confused opposition? I yield |
Date | 23:09:59, April 29, 2015 CET | From | Choice | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty on Fair Punishment |
Message | Democracy, Noun: *a system of government by the whole population or all the eligible members of a state, typically through elected representatives. *a state governed under a system of democracy. *control of an organization or group by the majority of its members. *the practice or principles of social equality. |
Date | 23:10:42, April 29, 2015 CET | From | Choice | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty on Fair Punishment |
Message | Diplomacy, Noun: *the profession, activity, or skill of managing international relations, typically by a country's representatives abroad. *the art of dealing with people in a sensitive and tactful way. |
Date | 23:11:38, April 29, 2015 CET | From | Choice | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty on Fair Punishment |
Message | Are we done? Unless when you say "who are familiar with the language of this land" you are referring to the fact this country in the game has random different definitions for words, that no one is aware of. |
Date | 00:12:17, April 30, 2015 CET | From | Hosian Socialist Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty on Fair Punishment |
Message | Mr. Speaker, I would point out that democracy is a system of government and diplomacy is the broad term of referring to exchanges amongst foreign dignitaries. I would like to remind the choice party that diplomacy cannot be a form of government ie: you cannot have a diplomacy in the same way that you have a democracy. This is basic political science, Mr. Speaker. I yield |
Date | 22:03:40, April 30, 2015 CET | From | Forward | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty on Fair Punishment |
Message | Mr Speaker, Arch apologizes for using the wrong word, we mean't to say democracy but had a spelling error. I yield |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 19 | |||
no | Total Seats: 25 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 61 |
Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
Random quote: "With this faith we will be able to work together, to pray together, to struggle together, to go to jail together, to stand up for freedom together, knowing that we will be free one day." - Martin Luther King Jr. |