Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5474
Next month in: 00:52:37
Server time: 15:07:22, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (5): AethanKal | ImperialLodamun | itsjustgav | johndoe1322 | JWDL | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Deregulation Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Hammerian Capitalist Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 2169

Description[?]:

Local governments know what's best for them... you all say you want to throw out Big Brother... well don't you consider a national government hanging over the local government to be a big brother? Got you in a corner.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date01:14:03, January 09, 2006 CET
FromIndependent Capitalist Party
ToDebating the Deregulation Act
MessageFor all but 4.

Date01:31:25, January 09, 2006 CET
FromIndependent Capitalist Party
ToDebating the Deregulation Act
MessageFor all now. <3

Bye, international Big Brother...

Date02:41:04, January 09, 2006 CET
FromFreedom Party
ToDebating the Deregulation Act
MessageWe demand the removal of the treaty withdrawal and the devolution of gambling.

Date09:07:50, January 09, 2006 CET
From Aloria Green Socialist Party
ToDebating the Deregulation Act
MessageNot in a corner at all. Human rights= good. Spying on people= bad. There you go.

Date13:01:04, January 09, 2006 CET
FromIndependent Capitalist Party
ToDebating the Deregulation Act
MessageArgh, you keep adding clauses. Will vote yes anyways, but barely.

Date22:13:36, January 09, 2006 CET
FromIndependent Capitalist Party
ToDebating the Deregulation Act
Message*sigh*

Choose between treaty withdrawl or f---ed up visibilities the exact opposite of my party? I have to vote yes.

Date22:22:01, January 09, 2006 CET
FromFreedom Party
ToDebating the Deregulation Act
MessageWhat shit.

Date22:53:51, January 09, 2006 CET
FromIndependent Capitalist Party
ToDebating the Deregulation Act
MessageFreedom Party, you can always repass them latter.

Date01:05:20, January 10, 2006 CET
From Aloria Green Socialist Party
ToDebating the Deregulation Act
MessageVoting against human rights?! Why would I ever enter into a coalition with either of you?

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 210

no
    

Total Seats: 202

abstain
   

Total Seats: 188


Random fact: In cases where players introduce RP laws to a nation and then leave, Moderation reserves the discretion to declare the RP laws void if they appear to have fallen into disuse. In particular, please bear in mind that a player who is inexperienced with Particracy role-play and has joined a nation as the only party there should not generally be expected to abide by RP laws implemented by previous players who have been and left.

Random quote: "Ask the experimenters why they experiment on animals, and the answer is: "Because the animals are like us." Ask the experimenters why it is morally okay to experiment on animals, and the answer is: "Because the animals are not like us." Animal experimentation rests on a logical contradiction." - Charles R. Magel

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 90