We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Deregulation Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Hammerian Capitalist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2169
Description[?]:
Local governments know what's best for them... you all say you want to throw out Big Brother... well don't you consider a national government hanging over the local government to be a big brother? Got you in a corner. |
Proposals
Article 1
Withdraw from the CIS Community Treaty.
Article 2
Withdraw from the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The nation's defence industry.
Old value:: The state owns national defence industries but these exist alongside privately owned defence industries.
Current: The state owns all defence industries.
Proposed: Defence industries are privately owned and not subsidised.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change Eminent Domain.
Old value:: The government may not seize private property.
Current: The government may seize private property for vital government works.
Proposed: The policy regarding eminent domain is left to local governments.
Article 5
Proposal[?] to change Commercial fishing regulation.
Old value:: The government establishes fishing quotas.
Current: Local governments can establish fishing quotas
Proposed: There are no limits on the amount of fish that may be caught.
Article 6
Proposal[?] to change Food safety policy.
Old value:: The government introduces, and actively enforces, food standards provisions.
Current: The government recommends food safety standards, but they are not enforced upon businesses.
Proposed: Local governments determine food safety standards.
Article 7
Proposal[?] to change The right to gamble.
Old value:: Only small-scale gambling is allowed, involving limited amounts of money; casinos are illegal.
Current: Gambling is illegal.
Proposed: Gambling is legal across the nation, no regulation whatsoever.
Article 8
Proposal[?] to change
The government's stance on illegal aliens.
Old value:: The government does not actively search for illegal aliens, but puts them in integration centers when discovered.
Current: The government does not actively search for illegal aliens, but puts them in integration centers when discovered.
Proposed: Dealing with illegal aliens is left to local governments.
Article 9
Proposal[?] to change Health and safety legislation for industry.
Old value:: The government introduces and actively regulates health and safety legislation in all areas of industry.
Current: The government introduces and actively regulates health and safety legislation in all areas of industry.
Proposed: Health and safety laws are to be determined by local governments.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 01:14:03, January 09, 2006 CET | From | Independent Capitalist Party | To | Debating the Deregulation Act |
Message | For all but 4. |
Date | 01:31:25, January 09, 2006 CET | From | Independent Capitalist Party | To | Debating the Deregulation Act |
Message | For all now. <3 Bye, international Big Brother... |
Date | 02:41:04, January 09, 2006 CET | From | Freedom Party | To | Debating the Deregulation Act |
Message | We demand the removal of the treaty withdrawal and the devolution of gambling. |
Date | 09:07:50, January 09, 2006 CET | From | Aloria Green Socialist Party | To | Debating the Deregulation Act |
Message | Not in a corner at all. Human rights= good. Spying on people= bad. There you go. |
Date | 13:01:04, January 09, 2006 CET | From | Independent Capitalist Party | To | Debating the Deregulation Act |
Message | Argh, you keep adding clauses. Will vote yes anyways, but barely. |
Date | 22:13:36, January 09, 2006 CET | From | Independent Capitalist Party | To | Debating the Deregulation Act |
Message | *sigh* Choose between treaty withdrawl or f---ed up visibilities the exact opposite of my party? I have to vote yes. |
Date | 22:22:01, January 09, 2006 CET | From | Freedom Party | To | Debating the Deregulation Act |
Message | What shit. |
Date | 22:53:51, January 09, 2006 CET | From | Independent Capitalist Party | To | Debating the Deregulation Act |
Message | Freedom Party, you can always repass them latter. |
Date | 01:05:20, January 10, 2006 CET | From | Aloria Green Socialist Party | To | Debating the Deregulation Act |
Message | Voting against human rights?! Why would I ever enter into a coalition with either of you? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 210 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 202 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 188 |
Random fact: In cases where players introduce RP laws to a nation and then leave, Moderation reserves the discretion to declare the RP laws void if they appear to have fallen into disuse. In particular, please bear in mind that a player who is inexperienced with Particracy role-play and has joined a nation as the only party there should not generally be expected to abide by RP laws implemented by previous players who have been and left. |
Random quote: "Ask the experimenters why they experiment on animals, and the answer is: "Because the animals are like us." Ask the experimenters why it is morally okay to experiment on animals, and the answer is: "Because the animals are not like us." Animal experimentation rests on a logical contradiction." - Charles R. Magel |