We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Population control
Details
Submitted by[?]: Fluss/River SD Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 3844
Description[?]:
The real world population hit 7.3 billion. Meanwhile our Likatonean population hit 99.000.000. In order to be sustainable and to save our environment, safety, high GDP/Capita, Personal luxory, Energy,Water and food consumption, we'll need to regulate our population growth. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's stance on population control.
Old value:: The government does not engage in population control.
Current: The government does not engage in population control.
Proposed: The government imposes a limit on the number of children per family.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 20:54:47, May 09, 2015 CET | From | Fluss/River SD Party | To | Debating the Population control |
Message | I've only wanted a governmental promotion of anti-population growth, but we haven't got that option, and taxing couples would make everyone just poorer. Because poor families ussualy have got more childies. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |
yes |
Total Seats: 106 | |
no | Total Seats: 144 | |
abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Particracy isn't just a game, it also has a forum, where players meet up to discuss role-playing, talk about in-game stuff, run their own newspaper or organisation and even discuss non-game and real-life issues! Check it out: http://forum.particracy.net/ |
Random quote: "The superior man is distressed by the limitations of his ability; he is not distressed by the fact that men do not recognize the ability that he has." - Confucius |