We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of December 2168
Details
Submitted by[?]: Free White Castle and The People Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2169
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Free White Castle and The People Party
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Seosavists Republican party
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Free White Castle and The People Party
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Luthori Green Party
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Seosavists Republican party
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Social Calvinist Unionist Party
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Seosavists Republican party
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Free White Castle and The People Party
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Social Calvinist Unionist Party
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Free White Castle and The People Party
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Free White Castle and The People Party
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Luthori Green Party
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Free White Castle and The People Party
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 01:07:46, January 10, 2006 CET | From | Free White Castle and The People Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2168 |
| Message | It is time for the left to form a coalition to fix the errors of our extremist predecessors. |
| Date | 01:08:36, January 10, 2006 CET | From | Social Calvinist Unionist Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2168 |
| Message | Aye! |
| Date | 01:51:04, January 10, 2006 CET | From | Luthori Green Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2168 |
| Message | Aye! |
| Date | 15:09:47, January 11, 2006 CET | From | Covenanters (IA) | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2168 |
| Message | I've only just realised this but you'd reduced the nuclear triumvirate to two parties. It would have been in the national interest to have Foreign Affairs and Defence covered by different parties. |
| Date | 15:17:01, January 11, 2006 CET | From | Luthori Green Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2168 |
| Message | Good point, in addition to that, having three parties increases the number of parties that can officially represent our nation (as a whole, instead of just one political party) on the forums. Important in the coming Second Terran World War. |
| Date | 15:20:50, January 11, 2006 CET | From | Covenanters (IA) | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2168 |
| Message | I was going to propose an RnP-CPP-DUP-LGP-RzP coalition cabinet: but we don't have enough seats between all 5 of us, and if we included WCP/SRP they would just it down (ironic considering I included the WCP in one of my failed proposals). |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 410 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 340 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: In general, role-play requires the consent of all players. |
| Random quote: "The difference between a republic and a people's republic is a lot like the difference between a jacket and a straightjacket." - Ronald Reagan |