Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5474
Next month in: 01:02:55
Server time: 14:57:04, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): AethanKal | itsjustgav | VojmatDun | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: NPH welcomes all to Luthori

Details

Submitted by[?]: Free White Castle and The People Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2171

Description[?]:

Let's encourage Luthori to grow

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date01:53:04, January 10, 2006 CET
FromLuthori Green Party
ToDebating the NPH welcomes all to Luthori
MessageYes.

Date05:29:32, January 10, 2006 CET
FromSocial Calvinist Unionist Party
ToDebating the NPH welcomes all to Luthori
Message'Fraid not.

Date06:42:21, January 10, 2006 CET
FromFree White Castle and The People Party
ToDebating the NPH welcomes all to Luthori
MessageWhat are your objections?

Date18:22:20, January 10, 2006 CET
FromCovenanters (IA)
ToDebating the NPH welcomes all to Luthori
Message1. It devalues citizenship
2. It allows foreigners to interfere in our sovereign affairs
3. It encourages asylum seekers and immigrants to come here

Date18:44:41, January 10, 2006 CET
FromFree White Castle and The People Party
ToDebating the NPH welcomes all to Luthori
MessageSorry DUP, not really directed towards you. Couldn't care less what you think.

Date10:06:58, January 11, 2006 CET
FromCovenanters (IA)
ToDebating the NPH welcomes all to Luthori
MessageYou will lose this majority when the game mechanics settle down and morality will be restored.

Date11:24:31, January 11, 2006 CET
FromFree White Castle and The People Party
ToDebating the NPH welcomes all to Luthori
MessageSee, I feel that your morality is immoral and un-Christian. Good think Jesus didn't tell you to cast the first stone if you were w/out sin.

Date13:57:37, January 11, 2006 CET
FromCovenanters (IA)
ToDebating the NPH welcomes all to Luthori
MessageI was never confused!

Date19:05:52, January 11, 2006 CET
FromFree White Castle and The People Party
ToDebating the NPH welcomes all to Luthori
MessageI know you think you are never confused or wrong, that is why Jesus would have a big knot on his head from where you hit him w/ a stone.

Date09:04:04, January 13, 2006 CET
FromFree White Castle and The People Party
ToDebating the NPH welcomes all to Luthori
MessageI voted for the Green Party's bill, but I would prefer it this way. Under current law everyone can become a national, but a national doesn't have citizenship rights. Under this law, those born in Luthori would always be citizens.

Date09:28:25, January 13, 2006 CET
FromLuthori Green Party
ToDebating the NPH welcomes all to Luthori
MessageI made my bill as a compromise, although I also prefer it this way. The only difference between a citizen and a national is that a citizen can vote and take part in politics. My bill made sure that citizenship went to those who wanted it, and had the intelligence and maturity to vote properly, rather than land owners, who could be politically apathetic.

Date09:30:55, January 13, 2006 CET
FromFree White Castle and The People Party
ToDebating the NPH welcomes all to Luthori
MessageWell hopefully we can get this bill through as well then.

Date23:25:41, January 13, 2006 CET
FromCovenanters (IA)
ToDebating the NPH welcomes all to Luthori
MessageNo difference between citizens and civilians? What's the point in that?

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 348

no
    

Total Seats: 402

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play.

Random quote: "Those who are responsible for the national security must be the sole judges of what the national security requires. It would be obviously undesirable that such matters should be made the subject of evidence in a court of law or otherwise discussed in public." - Unattributed member of the the House of Lords on the removal of trade union rights

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 79