We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Retirement Age Appropriation Mandate of 3857

Details

Submitted by^[?]: Block Party Party

Status^[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 3858

Description^[?]:

We wish to lower the retirement age here to ensure a young, effective workforce.

Proposal^[?] to change The professional retirement age.

Old value:: 65

Current: 60

Proposed: 61

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date	01:15:56, June 07, 2015 CET
From	Front of the People of Beluzia
To	Debating the Retirement Age Appropriation Mandate of 3857
Message	While this bill was proposed in the best of intensions, this would cause a collapse in our economy due to a huge gap of workers. Laws should focus on making the standard of living high to ensure our population lives to the current set age.

Date	01:18:36, June 07, 2015 CET
From	Block Party Party
To	Debating the Retirement Age Appropriation Mandate of 3857
Message	Most of our workforce is in their 20's or being educated. We should clear the way for the new generation to take on new responsibilities and let our elderly citizens enjoy the last portion of their lives. Why would this collapse the economy?

Date	03:13:45, June 07, 2015 CET
From	Front of the People of Beluzia
To	Debating the Retirement Age Appropriation Mandate of 3857
Message	It would due to the fact that a majority of the people 62-65 would look to retire when this legislation passes, and many people at that age hold important positions within society that could not be easily replaced within that time. Also the bureaucratic process of having to process this huge amount of people looking to retire would be a huge strain upon the state, as well as the readjustment of funds that would be needed to support this proposed retirement age.

Date	03:30:46, June 07, 2015 CET
From	Block Party Party
To	Debating the Retirement Age Appropriation Mandate of 3857
Message	Hierarchies in business are meant for these situations. We do agree, though, that some positions would be difficult to train for, though it would be feasible if the bill was instated over time. If we can add a resolution for a grace period between the passing of the bill and its enactment, would that work for your party? How is a 2 year period for you?

Date	03:35:17, June 07, 2015 CET
From	Front of the People of Beluzia
To	Debating the Retirement Age Appropriation Mandate of 3857
Message	We would find this suitable if your party could ensure the following 1. A well thought timeline concerning the implication of the bill 2. Explanation of how to acquire the funds needed to support welfare

Date	03:38:46, June 07, 2015 CET
From	Front of the People of Beluzia
To	Debating the Retirement Age Appropriation Mandate of 3857
Message	Upon these two being met we will support and urge the leftist majority to do the same.

Date	03:50:54, June 07, 2015 CET
From	Block Party Party
To	Debating the Retirement Age Appropriation Mandate of 3857
Message	1. We will start the timeline as soon as the bill passes. Within 8 months, the replacement for the outgoing worker must be found. If not by then, the company/agency would relinquish ability to participate in the timeline and would be subject to the bill. If a small business or underfunded agency cannot complete the requirements by the 8 month deadline, we will allow the business/agency in need to have another 6 months and enough time to train the new employee/worker as they need. After a maximum of 10 more months, the business would have to comply with this bill. If a business/agency can comply with this bill quickly, we will grant the business a 1.5% corporate tax break for a one year period and will prevent funding decreases for the agency involved for 2 years. We believe this will allow adequate time for companies to comply with this legislature. 2. A small rise in corporate tax (17% to 25% percent) and luxury tax (18% to 25%). Our estimations show that this is sufficient for the increased welfare for our nation with the passing of this bill.

Date	03:53:35, June 07, 2015 CET
From	Block Party Party
To	Debating the Retirement Age Appropriation Mandate of 3857
Message	Pardon the miscalculation in part 2. Due to the FotPB bill increasing taxation, we will propose a new taxation bill increasing tax on the top 3 classes by at least 10% with the 25% corporate and luxury taxes.

Date	04:08:55, June 07, 2015 CET
From	Front of the People of Beluzia
To	Debating the Retirement Age Appropriation Mandate of 3857
Message	While we would except this, be warned that the right leaning will throw a fit (quite literally) when they see that, but we will accept, and will try to convince the rest of the left to do so. We would propose only a 3-5% tax increase in the top 3 classes, that should be enough. (OCC- Due to my party having the ministry of Finance, we would have to propose the taxation of the three classes, but I will be happy to do so.)

Date	04:18:39, June 07, 2015 CET
From	Front of the People of Beluzia
To	Debating the Retirement Age Appropriation Mandate of 3857
Message	It has been proposed, you can find it at http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=438669

Date	04:20:43, June 07, 2015 CET
From	Block Party Party
To	Debating the Retirement Age Appropriation Mandate of 3857
Message	Thank you for the support and we will submit this bill immediately.

Date	04:35:51, June 07, 2015 CET
From	Front of the People of Beluzia
To	Debating the Retirement Age Appropriation Mandate of 3857
Message	We urge all parties to vote for this, so our nation may become stronger in youth while we give our elderly who rebuilt our great nation the recognition they deserve.

Vote

Seats

yes

Total Seats: 250

Total Seats: 62

abstain

Total Seats: 96

Random fact: Check out the forum regularly for game news. http://forum.particracy.net/

Random quote: "The only way I can lose this election is if I'm caught in bed with either a dead girl or a live boy." - Edwin W. Edwards

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 55