We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Protecting The Rutanian Family's Home Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Capitalist Working Families
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 3858
Description[?]:
In the condition that the Government decides to seize the private property of a Rutanian Family's home, this law stipulates that the VICTIM determines what is JUST compensation. --The CWFP |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Eminent domain compensation (if eminent domain is legal).
Old value:: A neutral body appointed by the courts determines the compensation, either party may appeal.
Current: A neutral body appointed by the courts determines the compensation, either party may appeal.
Proposed: The victim of eminent domain determines just compensation.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 17:51:01, June 07, 2015 CET | From | Friends of Nature | To | Debating the Protecting The Rutanian Family's Home Act |
| Message | The law says that Rutania can't use eminent domain. so why is this important ? I get why vote on eminent domain, but, it is illegal, so this law won't ever permis a single victim to determine the value of their houses, because there is no victim of something the government cannot do. at first, should we legalize eminent domain. Leia Black-White |
| Date | 18:24:42, June 07, 2015 CET | From | Rutanian Democratic Party | To | Debating the Protecting The Rutanian Family's Home Act |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, We would prefer if the government could appeal if the cost is set to high but this is fine for now. Sarah Eibenschütz Prime Minister |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 313 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 164 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 78 |
| Random fact: In cases where players have failed to clearly and accurately reference their nation's RP laws in the "Bills under debate" section, Moderation will rule them invalid if a challenge is made to their validity. |
| Random quote: "Up against the corporate government, voters find themselves asked to choose between look-alike candidates from two parties vying to see who takes the marching orders from their campaign paymasters and their future employers. The money of vested interest nullifies genuine voter choice and trust." - Ralph Nader |