We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: land mines
Details
Submitted by[?]: UNSC (ONI)
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 3859
Description[?]:
The military may use land mines in its operations, as long as they are tracked and cleared once possible. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy towards the use of land mines by the army.
Old value:: The use of land mines is prohibited.
Current: The use of land mines is prohibited.
Proposed: The use of land mines is allowed but restricted.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 22:32:11, June 07, 2015 CET | From | Friends of Nature | To | Debating the land mines |
Message | Another evil bill setup by evil militarists, Lands mines end up killing civilians,.... 20 years laters, but of course, right now military have no problem with field being unusables 20 years laters, because of their technology, they only care about right now. |
Date | 00:35:20, June 08, 2015 CET | From | Capitalist Working Families | To | Debating the land mines |
Message | Mr. Speaker, We agree 100% with the Friends of Nature. Land mines kill INNOCENT civilians. We are opposed this law. ---The CWFP |
Date | 01:58:13, June 08, 2015 CET | From | Rutanian Democratic Party | To | Debating the land mines |
Message | Mr. Speaker, We agree with the CWF on this issue. Sarah Eibenschütz Prime Minister |
Date | 20:35:07, June 08, 2015 CET | From | The Socially Conservative Party | To | Debating the land mines |
Message | Mr. Speaker, We agree that landmines can kill innocent civilians - maybe even years later. |
Date | 00:03:22, June 09, 2015 CET | From | UNSC (ONI) | To | Debating the land mines |
Message | Mr speaker The UNSC knows this, which is why they would be " restricted" and cleared once possible. They have proven dangerous hazards to advancing troops, and would be useful to defend snipers who have little or no outside support. |
Date | 00:50:44, June 09, 2015 CET | From | Friends of Nature | To | Debating the land mines |
Message | Mr. Speaker Other nations have mines detectors in their military, the civilians don't have them, so the civilians are going to get hurt. this is exactly military is strain on our nation. |
Date | 23:50:02, June 09, 2015 CET | From | Capitalist Working Families | To | Debating the land mines |
Message | "They have proven dangerous hazards to advancing troops, and would be useful to defend snipers who have little or no outside support."---UNSC Dear UNSC: We honestly don't follow your logic here. I mean, WHY would snipers need land mines to "protect" them when they are SNIPERS and are HIDDEN from view to take the open shot??? ---The CWFP |
Date | 23:50:04, June 09, 2015 CET | From | Capitalist Working Families | To | Debating the land mines |
Message | "They have proven dangerous hazards to advancing troops, and would be useful to defend snipers who have little or no outside support."---UNSC Dear UNSC: We honestly don't follow your logic here. I mean, WHY would snipers need land mines to "protect" them when they are SNIPERS and are HIDDEN from view to take the open shot??? ---The CWFP |
Date | 23:51:14, June 09, 2015 CET | From | Capitalist Working Families | To | Debating the land mines |
Message | OOC: Sorry for the double post. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||||
yes |
Total Seats: 26 | ||||||
no |
Total Seats: 451 | ||||||
abstain | Total Seats: 78 |
Random fact: You can inactivate yourself on your User Page. You will then lose all your seats but your party account won't be deleted, and your party's Visibility ratings will not diminish. Reactivation can be requested in the "Reactivation Requests" thread in the Game Moderation section of the Particracy Forum. |
Random quote: "Politics is supposed to be the second oldest profession. I have come to realize that it bears a very close resemblance to the first." Ronald Reagan (1911 - 2004) |