We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Debate on Possible Name Change
Details
Submitted by[?]: Federal Heritage Party of Hutori
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 3862
Description[?]:
| The purpose of this debate is to gauge the opinions of Federal congress on the posibility of returning to the name Athlorcaea instead of Hutori. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 19:13:54, June 10, 2015 CET | From |  United Civic Alliance | To | Debating the Debate on Possible Name Change |
| Message | OOC: I oppose this change. Athlorcaea was the name of Hutori a long time ago, but since at least the 2800s (when I was first here), Hutori has been Hutori. |
| Date | 20:33:43, June 10, 2015 CET | From | Federal Heritage Party of Hutori | To | Debating the Debate on Possible Name Change |
| Message | OOC: It is just a suggestion. And of course we could come up with something new or even keep it the same. |
| Date | 00:04:30, June 11, 2015 CET | From | Conservative People's Party | To | Debating the Debate on Possible Name Change |
| Message | OOC: I agree with the NLP, it was Athlorcaea long before I started and it seems kind of unlikely unless we got a reactionary sort of party in power, and they wanted to return to a "Golden Age" by changing the name. Keeping it the same doesn't change anything, and there hasn't been much political change. In fact, due to OOC agreements and similar platforms, there was a decades long "Era of Good Feelings" in Hutori after the Religious wars/uprisings. In retrospect, a name change might have come in handy then. Either way, I think if the name is changed, there should be a solid IC reason, which I have yet to think about outside of those two examples. |
| Date | 10:17:02, June 14, 2015 CET | From | New Progressive Party | To | Debating the Debate on Possible Name Change |
| Message | I'm not sure if there is any strong reason to beyond pointing to the "good old days". If anything, the move may make our nation seem more backwards. |
| Date | 11:07:24, June 14, 2015 CET | From | New Progressive Party | To | Debating the Debate on Possible Name Change |
| Message | OOC: forgot to add OOC to my comment above |
| Date | 19:03:48, June 14, 2015 CET | From | Federal Heritage Party of Hutori | To | Debating the Debate on Possible Name Change |
| Message | The purpose of moving this bill to vote is to merely archive the discussion. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 0 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 187 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 348 |
| Random fact: If you are likely to be logging in to Particracy with the same IP address as another player with an active account, please inform Moderation on the forum. Otherwise your account could be inactivated on suspicion of multi-accounting. |
| Random quote: "Whenever the people are well informed, they can be trusted with their own government; that whenever things get so far wrong as to attract their notice, they may be relied on to set them to rights." - Thomas Jefferson |