We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Freedom Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Rutanian Democratic Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 3860
Description[?]:
| X |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The distribution, purchasing and possession of material depicting pornographic acts.
Old value:: Pornography depicting consenting adults is legal for adults.
Current: Pornography depicting consenting adults is legal for adults.
Proposed: Pornography depicting consenting adults is legal for everyone.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Policy on the legality of abortions
Old value:: Abortions are only allowed in medical emergencies.
Current: Abortion is allowed during the first and second trimesters.
Proposed: Abortion is allowed during the first trimester.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding sexually explicit material on broadcast television.
Old value:: Sexually explicit material is not allowed, but nudity that is not sexually explicit is.
Current: All sexually explicit material is allowed on television.
Proposed: All sexually explicit material is allowed on television.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 03:38:06, June 11, 2015 CET | From | Capitalist Working Families | To | Debating the Freedom Act |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, (1) It is not the duty of government to allow little children to watch porn if their parents are opposed. Now, if their are liberal parents that allow their teenager to watch such programming, that is ok. (2) Strongly opposed. To the RDP, what if YOUR mom decided to "exercise her right to choose" when you were 2 months in her womb??? Would you be even in this Parliament??? (3) We can support this IF it bans VIOLENT pornography. Porn depicting rape is NOT free speech, but criminal solicitation. --The CWFP |
| Date | 04:03:12, June 11, 2015 CET | From | Friends of Nature | To | Debating the Freedom Act |
| Message | MR. Speaker. not one should care for the objection of a religious party who stand for religious government. And Children have the right to not be oppressed by their religious parents. We approve this bill We would like abortion to be totally legalised... |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes | Total Seats: 155 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 322 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: "OOC", "IC" and "IG" are commonly-used acronyms in Particracy. "OOC" refers to comments, discussions and actions which are out-of-character, meaning they are done player-to-player rather than party-to-party. "IC" refers to in-character interactions (ie. party-to-party). Similarly, "IG" means in-game, although this term may also simply refer to what happens in the actual game interface, as opposed to on the forum or elsewhere. "RP" just means "role-play". |
| Random quote: "For every action there is an equal and opposite government program." - Bob Wells |