Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: August 5474
Next month in: 00:45:30
Server time: 23:14:29, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): burgerboys | R Drax | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Anti-Mafia project

Details

Submitted by[?]: Friends of Nature

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 3862

Description[?]:

We do not have any law agaisnt the Mafia, this is unforgivable.

We must directly seize their land through government action and redistribute to newly created cooperatives.

Being part of the Mafia must criminal
------- Sarah Green-Flores

So this bill
- Criminalize appartenance to a Mafia
- Leave the definition of the mafia to the ministry of Justice
- Allow the government to seize the property of the Mafia, Nationalize them or redistribute them in the form of cooperatives.
- Call the government to end the Mafia once and for all.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date01:20:53, June 15, 2015 CET
FromCapitalist Working Families
ToDebating the Anti-Mafia project
Message
Mr. Speaker & FON Representative,

As the representative of the Justice Department in your recent cabinent, we applaud this bill that tightens controls on organized crime and the mafia.

However, we are STRONGLY OPPOSED to one critical resolution that can be SEVERELY abused by a future Justice Department in Rutania, that is the following:

"Leave the definition of the mafia to the ministry of Justice"---FON

You see, to simply allow GOVERNMENT BUREAUCRATS to arbitrarily define WHAT or WHO is an abstract concept as "Mafia" poses a CLEAR & PRESENT DANGER to freedom and this Constitutional Republic and/or Democracy.

I mean, what if the Justice Department defined "Mafia" as a "Group of citizens opposed to Climate Change/Global Warming, Labor Unions, or Atheist???" Now, their legal rights can be denied and all of their private property STOLEN simply for expressing a political OPINION that maybe different from the Governments!!!

---Justice Hugo Black
Chief Justice of the Rutanian Supreme Court

Date01:31:11, June 15, 2015 CET
FromFriends of Nature
ToDebating the Anti-Mafia project
MessageMr. Speaker.

I demand the immediatenresignation fo Justice Hugo Black. who do not respect the law of our country

and the law of our country demand our public employes, to promises political independance, we see a judge acting directly as a spokeperson of a political party. you do not give us political independance we promesses.

The critics you made, would be valid if our government was uncontrollable or if political employee where appointed politicly, but this is not true. Our public servant are more then intelligent to determine what is a Mafia and what is not a Mafia, and they are responsable in face of the ministry of justice, so, I don't feel the danger denounced by the CWF..

Reimi Black-White

OOC : I read this in our laws.

Appointments and requirements for government employees.

All government employees have to promise political independence.

Alternatives:Government employees are selected and appointed in a political way...
I believe judge in the suprême court is a government employee and should not be in a political party.

Date01:32:10, June 15, 2015 CET
FromFriends of Nature
ToDebating the Anti-Mafia project
MessageAlthough I understand that is the case in united states, but in U.S. Judge are not independant, they are political. something they are not in Canada, you don't have liberal judges or conservatives judges in Canada...

Date01:32:24, June 15, 2015 CET
FromFriends of Nature
ToDebating the Anti-Mafia project
MessageMeant to do OOC.. Sorry

Date02:22:45, June 15, 2015 CET
FromRutanian Democratic Party
ToDebating the Anti-Mafia project
MessageMr. Speaker,

We would support but your bill mentions nationalizations, which we don't support. We woukd support a bill making monopolies illegal.

Levi Bright
RDP Parliamentary Leader

Date03:37:27, June 15, 2015 CET
FromCapitalist Working Families
ToDebating the Anti-Mafia project
Message
Dear FON,

I, Chief Justice Hugo Black of the Rutanian Supreme Court, is POLITICALLY INDEPENDENT because I am a registered member of the Rutanian DEMOCRATIC Party who was appointed on the Supreme Court for LIFE TENURE. Since I was appointed for LIFE, no politician can remove me from office simply for DISAGREEING with the Government or that political party.

---Chief Justice Hugo Black,
Rutanian Supreme Court

Date03:58:39, June 15, 2015 CET
FromFriends of Nature
ToDebating the Anti-Mafia project
MessageOOC : if this guy belong to the RDP' then the RDP should roleplay him

OOC : A judge who is part of a political party is not independent.

Date06:17:06, June 15, 2015 CET
FromCapitalist Working Families
ToDebating the Anti-Mafia project
MessageOOC: Friends of Nature, actually in Canada's system that requires judges to DISAVOW membership within a political party is an ENEMY to democracy. Let me explain: you see, EVERYONE on the planet--including judges on the Canada's Supreme Court---has a POLITICAL ORIENTATION and individual viewpoints. However, in the American system, your lawyer can strategically bet and strategize on how to win a legal case because the Justices are UPFRONT that they are either members of the Democratic Party or the Republican Party.

On the contrary, in Canada's system, your lawyer has NO IDEA how the judges will rule b/c their politics are CONCEALED. That being said, they could be a CLOSETED Fascist supporter of Hitler or Mussolini but you will NEVER know. Those SUBJECTIVE political beliefs can BIAS their case.

In conclusion, Thomas Jefferson (the 3rd President of the U.S.) said that the most DANGEROUS threat to liberty was "The Tyranny of an OLIGARGY (or the body of the Court packed with UN-elected judges for LIFE TENUE)."

So, judges with a HIDDEN political belief set can systematically take freedom from EVERYBODY.

What are your thoughts?

Date09:55:32, June 15, 2015 CET
FromFriends of Nature
ToDebating the Anti-Mafia project
MessageAlready answer in a private message

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 234

no
    

Total Seats: 294

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Real life-life nationalities, cultures or ethnicities should not be referenced in Particracy (eg. "German").

Random quote: "Popular suffrage is in itself no guarantee of freedom. People can vote themselves into slavery." - Frank Chodorov

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 55