We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Privacy Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: United Republics Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 3875
Description[?]:
. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Right to privacy.
Old value:: Individuals have a right to privacy, but the courts can force individuals to give information on certain matters if needed. (also known as Habeas Data).
Current: Individuals have a right to privacy, to keep records and information for themselves.
Proposed: The government has the right to monitor information of individuals without letting them know.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 13:47:16, June 20, 2015 CET | From | Metzian Party of Lodamun | To | Debating the Privacy Act |
Message | M.Speaker, Oh...so this is 'privacy act' Tony Leader of UDHFU |
Date | 21:46:40, June 20, 2015 CET | From | Great National Republican Guard | To | Debating the Privacy Act |
Message | Mr. Speaker, If the GNRG had proposed this bill, the opposition parties would have jumped to condemn it. -- Trevor Fertig, Chairman of the GNRG, Vice President of GDR Lodamun |
Date | 22:08:33, June 20, 2015 CET | From | United Republics Party | To | Debating the Privacy Act |
Message | M. Speaker, The other parties in the opposition are free to oppose this bill. The United Republics encourage them to vote their conscience and speak out against the bill if they choose to do so. Noctos Moctos URP Leader |
Date | 01:05:07, June 22, 2015 CET | From | Court of Shades | To | Debating the Privacy Act |
Message | Mr Speaker, The Shadow Alliance will not be supporting this bill. We will not, however, condemn this. Why? Because the URP is not in government, so cannot use these proposed powers for their own self-interest. The URP obviously believes that these powers would be for the good of the country. We can not condemn URP for that. When GRNG propose these types of measures, it is obviously a bid to increase there own personal power over the citizens of Lodamun, which we will condemn everyday of the week if we have too. Nick Bird Leader of the Opposition The Shadow Alliance |
Date | 01:48:06, June 25, 2015 CET | From | People of Freedom (P.F) | To | Debating the Privacy Act |
Message | Mr. Speaker. I have always been an organized person & promote this organisation within our law. I will advise our party to vote no. Dr. Gina Berg Minister of Justice |
Date | 03:30:45, July 13, 2015 CET | From | Social Labor Coalition | To | Debating the Privacy Act |
Message | Mr. Speaker, Unacceptable. We cannot support this sort of tyranny and imposition upon our freedoms. Joim Devany Spokesman for Government Affairs M.P. for Clifton |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 176 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 381 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 42 |
Random fact: Moderation will not approve a Cultural Protocol request within the first 48 hours of it being requested. This is in order to give other players a chance to query the proposed changes, if they wish to do so. Moderation may be approached for advice on a proposed change, but any advice proffered should always be understood under the provisio that no final decision will be made until at least 48 hours after the request has been formally submitted for approval. |
Random quote: "Politics is the art of postponing decisions until they are no longer relevant." - Henri Queuille |