Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5461
Next month in: 01:08:22
Server time: 06:51:37, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Privacy Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: United Republics Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 3875

Description[?]:

.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date13:47:16, June 20, 2015 CET
FromMetzian Party of Lodamun
ToDebating the Privacy Act
MessageM.Speaker,

Oh...so this is 'privacy act'

Tony
Leader of UDHFU

Date21:46:40, June 20, 2015 CET
From Great National Republican Guard
ToDebating the Privacy Act
MessageMr. Speaker,

If the GNRG had proposed this bill, the opposition parties would have jumped to condemn it.

--

Trevor Fertig,
Chairman of the GNRG,
Vice President of GDR Lodamun

Date22:08:33, June 20, 2015 CET
FromUnited Republics Party
ToDebating the Privacy Act
MessageM. Speaker,

The other parties in the opposition are free to oppose this bill. The United Republics encourage them to vote their conscience and speak out against the bill if they choose to do so.

Noctos Moctos
URP Leader

Date01:05:07, June 22, 2015 CET
FromCourt of Shades
ToDebating the Privacy Act
MessageMr Speaker,

The Shadow Alliance will not be supporting this bill.

We will not, however, condemn this. Why? Because the URP is not in government, so cannot use these proposed powers for their own self-interest. The URP obviously believes that these powers would be for the good of the country. We can not condemn URP for that.

When GRNG propose these types of measures, it is obviously a bid to increase there own personal power over the citizens of Lodamun, which we will condemn everyday of the week if we have too.

Nick Bird
Leader of the Opposition
The Shadow Alliance

Date01:48:06, June 25, 2015 CET
FromPeople of Freedom (P.F)
ToDebating the Privacy Act
MessageMr. Speaker.

I have always been an organized person & promote this organisation within our law. I will advise our party to vote no.

Dr. Gina Berg
Minister of Justice

Date03:30:45, July 13, 2015 CET
FromSocial Labor Coalition
ToDebating the Privacy Act
MessageMr. Speaker,

Unacceptable. We cannot support this sort of tyranny and imposition upon our freedoms.

Joim Devany
Spokesman for Government Affairs
M.P. for Clifton


subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 176

no
    

Total Seats: 381

abstain
  

Total Seats: 42


Random fact: Moderation will not approve a Cultural Protocol request within the first 48 hours of it being requested. This is in order to give other players a chance to query the proposed changes, if they wish to do so. Moderation may be approached for advice on a proposed change, but any advice proffered should always be understood under the provisio that no final decision will be made until at least 48 hours after the request has been formally submitted for approval.

Random quote: "Politics is the art of postponing decisions until they are no longer relevant." - Henri Queuille

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 72