We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Internet Security Legislation
Details
Submitted by[?]: Grand Republican Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2171
Description[?]:
| The Grand Republican Party is extremely worried by the passing of previous legislation that bars the police from investigating illegal filesharing, and more importantly, child abuse webrings on the internet. The Grand Republican Party is not for the restrictions of civil rights, but we believe that limited actions should be accorded to the police forces, especially in investigating the heinous crimes commited by paedophiles and their ilk. Thus, we call for the polices powers to be reinstated, so that they may track down, locate and arrest the paedophiles and their webrings, and stop the abuses they propogate on the internet. This will save lives, and put these people behind bars, where they belong. The police should be able to do their duty, and stop these people from broadcasting their illegal and awful images and writing, without having to rely on normal citizens to gather evidence and wade through the filth to present evidence. Allow the police to do their jobs, all without breaching privacy. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Internet regulations.
Old value:: The government has no position on who may use or what is published on the internet.
Current: The government allows anyone to use the internet but the police can run investigations concerning illegal activities conducted by using internet (child abuse, illegal filesharing, ...)
Proposed: The government allows anyone to use the internet but the police can run investigations concerning illegal activities conducted by using internet (child abuse, illegal filesharing, ...)
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 21:17:44, January 10, 2006 CET | From | Liberal Imperialist Party | To | Debating the Internet Security Legislation |
| Message | Aye. |
| Date | 23:15:41, January 10, 2006 CET | From | Radical Freedom Party | To | Debating the Internet Security Legislation |
| Message | We are quite obviously opposed to a repeal of a piece of legislation that was passed mere months ago! I implore this House to show consistency and maintain Rutanian Privacy Laws. |
| Date | 01:48:59, January 11, 2006 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the Internet Security Legislation |
| Message | Aye! |
| Date | 09:08:17, January 11, 2006 CET | From | Nationalist Party | To | Debating the Internet Security Legislation |
| Message | mah.... |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 274 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 325 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life brand names (eg. Coca Cola, McDonalds, Microsoft). However, in the case of military equipment brand names it is permitted to use simple number-letter combinations (eg. T-90 and F-22) borrowed from real life, and also simple generic names, like those of animals (eg. Leopard and Jaguar). |
| Random quote: "Politics is perhaps the only profession for which no preparation is thought necessary." - Robert Louis Stevenson |