Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 5461
Next month in: 03:58:27
Server time: 20:01:32, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): ADM Drax | JWBa | R Drax | SocDemDundorfian | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Right to Bear Arms, ( A civil liberty bill)

Details

Submitted by[?]: Libertarian Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 2170

Description[?]:

Allow all persons to bear arms and compel those that do to do so openly.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date22:27:55, January 10, 2006 CET
From Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Right to Bear Arms, ( A civil liberty bill)
MessageIf an individual has the right to own a weapon then that individual should have the freedom to own whatever weapon they can afford.

Those with a violent past have paid their penance to society and if they are now judged fit to walk our streets then they should have the same rights as anyone else. Thsoe with dangerous mental illnesses are not allowed on the streets anyway so that clause is nurgatory.

If people are to carry weapons everyone else should be able to see they are doing so, this will lead to less 'accidents'.

Date01:14:58, January 12, 2006 CET
From Progressive Anti-Fascist Communist Party
ToDebating the Right to Bear Arms, ( A civil liberty bill)
MessageWTF??// ARE YOU CRAZY??????

Date01:15:39, January 12, 2006 CET
From Progressive Anti-Fascist Communist Party
ToDebating the Right to Bear Arms, ( A civil liberty bill)
Messageyeh....... less "accidents" when a mentally ill person is openly carrying an RPG......

Date20:07:04, January 12, 2006 CET
From Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Right to Bear Arms, ( A civil liberty bill)
MessageA 'right' is still a 'right', the size of the weapon makes no difference if you accept there is a 'right' to own it.

Otherwise it would be like saying you have the 'right' to worship whatever deity you please as long as it is not also woshipped by more than 1billion people!

Date10:58:37, January 13, 2006 CET
From Progressive Anti-Fascist Communist Party
ToDebating the Right to Bear Arms, ( A civil liberty bill)
Messageyes..... that is what i am saying.......

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 106

no
    

Total Seats: 75

abstain
  

Total Seats: 112


Random fact: It is possible for a player to transfer ownership of a character or a royal house to another player. This should be done in a public way, such as on the Character Transfers thread, so that if a dispute arises in the future, Moderation can be pointed towards evidence of the transfer.

Random quote: "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has." - Margaret Mead

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 61