Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 5461
Next month in: 02:06:33
Server time: 21:53:26, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): hexaus18 | SE33 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: 'Controversial' Ingredients Bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: Progress Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 3869

Description[?]:

X

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date21:02:25, June 29, 2015 CET
FromChoice
ToDebating the 'Controversial' Ingredients Bill
MessageEveryone has a right to know whether their ingredients are genetically modified or not.

Date23:00:27, June 29, 2015 CET
FromHosian Socialist Party
ToDebating the 'Controversial' Ingredients Bill
MessageMr. Speaker,

Please tell Choice to stop fear mongering, the current legislation is just a burden for our farmers.

I yield.

Date23:11:35, June 29, 2015 CET
FromChoice
ToDebating the 'Controversial' Ingredients Bill
MessageA burden, a BURDEN?!?!?

Consumers have the right to know whether or not their ingredients are genetically modified, plus labelling is barely much of a burden.

Date23:58:53, June 29, 2015 CET
FromHosian Socialist Party
ToDebating the 'Controversial' Ingredients Bill
MessageMr. Speaker,

We all know that GMO's are harmless, this is only serving fear to our people, not solutions.

I yield

Date01:55:21, June 30, 2015 CET
FromConservative Party of Luthori
ToDebating the 'Controversial' Ingredients Bill
MessageMr. Speaker,

That may be, but what about the right for the citizens to know what products are in their food? What if I'm allergic to a certain chemical in the food from the GMO yet, I'm not allowed to know wether or not I'm going to have a reaction to it? This is taking away the rights of the many to give to the few.

Eric Richardson
Leader of the Liberal Progressives

Date03:26:35, June 30, 2015 CET
FromHosian Socialist Party
ToDebating the 'Controversial' Ingredients Bill
MessageMr. speaker,

I would reply to that obscenely inaccurate comment from the conservative liberals but I'm afraid that I'm still laughing from it's lack of factuality. Welcome to a debate with the HSP Mr. Richardson, we burn strawman arguments like heathens.

I yield

Date04:49:19, June 30, 2015 CET
FromConservative Party of Luthori
ToDebating the 'Controversial' Ingredients Bill
MessageMr. Speaker,

Firstly, we are the Liberal Progressives, secondly it is a perfectly real fact. The HSP just doesn't know how to answer it.

Eric Richardson
Leader of the Liberal Progressives

Date12:06:59, June 30, 2015 CET
FromChoice
ToDebating the 'Controversial' Ingredients Bill
MessageEveryone has a right to know what they are consuming, regardless of whether we see it as important or not. Some people may wish to avoid GMOs.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 206

no
     

Total Seats: 195

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context.

    Random quote: "A conservative is a man who believes that nothing should be done for the first time." - Alfred E. Wiggam

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 59