We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Public Sex Enjoyment for All Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: United Republics Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 3875
Description[?]:
| . |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Displays of public affection and obscenity laws.
Old value:: Sexual intercourse is illegal in public.
Current: All sexually implicit actions are illegal in public.
Proposed: There are no laws regarding obscene public acts.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 22:29:21, July 01, 2015 CET | From | United Republics Party | To | Debating the Public Sex Enjoyment for All Act |
| Message | M. Speaker, The United Republics generally do not propose massive bills like this, but the upcoming election and our laziness require it. Noctos Moctos URP Leader |
| Date | 05:46:14, July 02, 2015 CET | From | Grand Nationalist Fraction | To | Debating the Public Sex Enjoyment for All Act |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, there are quite a few propositions my party and I find disturbing. We will have to say no. John Uyttebroeck LNC spokesman |
| Date | 02:56:09, July 03, 2015 CET | From | Court of Shades | To | Debating the Public Sex Enjoyment for All Act |
| Message | Mr Speaker, The Shadow Alliance supports all articles except 1 and 3. We do not like these massive super bills, however, we will support this one, as on balance it has good proposals for Lodamun. Nick Bird Leader of Shades The Shadow Alliance |
| Date | 03:03:27, July 03, 2015 CET | From | United Republics Party | To | Debating the Public Sex Enjoyment for All Act |
| Message | M. Speaker, The URP did not submit this bill in time for the last election. We will not put this bill to a vote, but it will remain here until the URP pursues alternatives. Noctos Moctos URP Leader |
| Date | 05:42:14, July 03, 2015 CET | From | Social Labor Coalition | To | Debating the Public Sex Enjoyment for All Act |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, I respectfully address Mr. Noctos: let's look at the individual articles of the bill to put those up for future legislation. Clearly, some parties support or reject the bill completely based on a couple articles of contention, so breaking it up would be advisable - as our own party experienced with the rushed Judicial Reform Act. On the bill itself, our party generally supports the bill with the exceptions of articles 3 and 5 for public health and safety reasons. Gun ownership has been linked to increased homicides and domestic violence, and bestiality also has strongly been linked to personal injury and sexually transmitted diseases. Both of which would counterbalance the freedoms rent by this legislation, unfortunately. Marko Djokovic Spokesperson for Judicial Affairs Member of the PLF Central Committee |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 191 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 366 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 42 |
| Random fact: There is a phpBB forum dedicated to Particracy. Please click the Forum link in the top game menu. Additions to the game, suggestions and discussion is held there so get involved. http://forum.particracy.net/ |
| Random quote: "The main problem of the left is that it has been traditionally divided and unable to reach agreements between different leftist views, whilst the right has almost always moved in the same direction by giving concessions to different rightist points of view." - Aelius Celer, former Selucian politician |