We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ratification of the Dorvik-Kanjor Friendship Treaty
Details
Submitted by[?]: Dorvische Allianz für Freiheit
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 3884
Description[?]:
| This bill asks for the ratification of the Dorvik-Kanjor Friendship Treaty. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law. |
Proposals
Article 1
Ratify the Dorvik-Kanjor Friendship Treaty.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 17:17:31, July 28, 2015 CET | From | Dorvische Allianz für Freiheit | To | Debating the Ratification of the Dorvik-Kanjor Friendship Treaty |
| Message | This is a new version of a treaty signed in February 3777 by Dorvik and Kanjor. |
| Date | 19:54:17, July 28, 2015 CET | From | Hosianische Demokraten | To | Debating the Ratification of the Dorvik-Kanjor Friendship Treaty |
| Message | We disagree with this treaty. |
| Date | 21:48:20, July 28, 2015 CET | From | Hosian-Konservative Allianz | To | Debating the Ratification of the Dorvik-Kanjor Friendship Treaty |
| Message | Herr Speaker, We believe that we need to edit some things in this treaty, we do not believe on sharing entirely science and technical information; especially military information. Voldemar von Farber. |
| Date | 09:44:49, July 29, 2015 CET | From | Hosianische Demokraten | To | Debating the Ratification of the Dorvik-Kanjor Friendship Treaty |
| Message | Article III. Is the only acceptable one, but we disagree with the free-trade part. All other articles arent aceptable. And we have to share scientific and technological data, information & discoveries. |
| Date | 13:32:29, July 29, 2015 CET | From | Dorvische Allianz für Freiheit | To | Debating the Ratification of the Dorvik-Kanjor Friendship Treaty |
| Message | Herr Speaker, I ask the opposition to read the treaty correctly. It doesn't state that we give away our military and technological secrets, but it states that we should ENCOURAGE the exchange of data between our companies and institutions. Besides, this doesn't mean that we'd be the only ones giving our data, we'd also get data from the other side, which is only in our favour. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 495 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: "OOC", "IC" and "IG" are commonly-used acronyms in Particracy. "OOC" refers to comments, discussions and actions which are out-of-character, meaning they are done player-to-player rather than party-to-party. "IC" refers to in-character interactions (ie. party-to-party). Similarly, "IG" means in-game, although this term may also simply refer to what happens in the actual game interface, as opposed to on the forum or elsewhere. "RP" just means "role-play". |
| Random quote: "A return to first principles in a republic is sometimes caused by the simple virtues of one man. His good example has such an influence that the good men strive to imitate him, and the wicked are ashamed to lead a life so contrary to his example." - Niccolo Machiavelli |