We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: More babies, less devil worship!
Details
Submitted by[?]: People's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2171
Description[?]:
They are plastic penis wrappers which take out all the feeling from sex and make it a loveless act of subserviance to foriegn devils. God wants you to be fruitful and multiply, but our communist betrayer wants to tie a knot around your willy so it will fall off, emasculating you. The time to strike is now! |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on subsidising contraception.
Old value:: The government offers free contraceptives in pharmacies and public toilets.
Current: The government offers free contraceptives in pharmacies and public toilets.
Proposed: Contraceptives are banned for religious reasons.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 08:59:13, January 12, 2006 CET | From | LiberalDemocraticFreedomTaxAndSpendParty | To | Debating the More babies, less devil worship! |
Message | Nay. |
Date | 07:24:49, January 13, 2006 CET | From | Moderate Beluzians | To | Debating the More babies, less devil worship! |
Message | Considering that the country lacks a state religion, we should not pass national laws with a basis in religious reasons. |
Date | 04:00:58, January 14, 2006 CET | From | Secular Capitalist Party | To | Debating the More babies, less devil worship! |
Message | Do you mean that we should not create baseless irrational laws? |
Date | 07:10:12, January 14, 2006 CET | From | Moderate Beluzians | To | Debating the More babies, less devil worship! |
Message | Yes. Though each person's defination of that is different. |
Date | 09:04:21, January 14, 2006 CET | From | Secular Capitalist Party | To | Debating the More babies, less devil worship! |
Message | No definitions of concept/word are objectively created and followed if the user wants to be considered a rational person. |
Date | 18:22:16, January 14, 2006 CET | From | Moderate Beluzians | To | Debating the More babies, less devil worship! |
Message | What I meant was I consider some of your bills baseless and irrational but you appearently don't. So I guess by your comment, you aren't rational. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes | Total Seats: 31 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 62 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 7 |
Random fact: Submitting a bill without any proposals in it will not attract or detract voters. It will not raise your visibility or change your political position. |
Random quote: "I think one should not go fast, because if you make mistakes you don't realize what you've done." - Manuela Carmena |