We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Civil Liberties (Freedom) bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Libertarian Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2171
Description[?]:
A bill to free the people. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The citizens' right to assemble in public.
Old value:: The police may disperse a group if they believe it poses a potential risk to public safety.
Current: There are no restrictions on the right of citizens to assemble in groups.
Proposed: There are no restrictions on the right of citizens to assemble in groups.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy on public nudity.
Old value:: Public nudity is illegal, but private nudist colonies and beaches are permitted.
Current: Public nudity is illegal, but private nudist colonies and beaches are permitted.
Proposed: There are no laws with regards to public nudity, it is allowed.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 20:58:13, January 12, 2006 CET | From | Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Civil Liberties (Freedom) bill |
Message | Government should be of the people, BY the people and therefore the government has no right to tell a person what to do as long as what they are doing does not directly harm another person or the defence of the state. Restricting the ability to congregate in public is an oft abused piece of legislation that is used to ban political protests under the guise of it being a 'threat to public safety' when all they mean is a threat to the governments policies. Such practices should not be allowed in a civilised nation. |
Date | 11:02:50, January 13, 2006 CET | From | Progressive Anti-Fascist Communist Party | To | Debating the Civil Liberties (Freedom) bill |
Message | no |
Date | 22:25:38, January 13, 2006 CET | From | First Socialist Party | To | Debating the Civil Liberties (Freedom) bill |
Message | This is unfortunate... We do not agree with the first... yet fully agree with the second. We will have to vote no for now. |
Date | 23:02:39, January 13, 2006 CET | From | Libertarian Republican Party | To | Debating the Civil Liberties (Freedom) bill |
Message | This is disgusting! The Libertarian Party supports immorality! We cannot allow individuals to offend the community! All objectionable groups (including people who prefer to be nude) must be banned. |
Date | 23:37:19, January 13, 2006 CET | From | Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Civil Liberties (Freedom) bill |
Message | Well that is nice, we find the Statist Party objectionable, does that mean you support us all banning you? |
Date | 01:54:18, January 14, 2006 CET | From | Libertarian Republican Party | To | Debating the Civil Liberties (Freedom) bill |
Message | We don't support it, but there wouldn't be much we could do about it if you ever did. We plan on banning you if we ever get the chance. Libertarianism is a disgusting ideology and all who support it are traitors! |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 50 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 124 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 119 |
Random fact: If you want to leave Particracy, please inactivate yourself on your user page to save the moderation team some time. |
Random quote: "Hatred is not, and should never be considered as another form of freedom of expression." - Icarion Dadhelus, former Selucian politician |