We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Homosexual Marriage Appeal
Details
Submitted by[?]: Dorvish Popular Front
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2034
Description[?]:
| We think homosexuals should not be allowed to marry. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy toward marriage.
Old value:: The government allows all consenting adults to obtain civil marriage contracts.
Current: The government allows all consenting adults to obtain civil marriage contracts.
Proposed: The government only recognises civil marriages between a man and a woman.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | not recorded | From | To | Debating the Homosexual Marriage Appeal |
| Message | What's with all of this sponaneous religious right nonsense? Dorvik has been liberal in this respect for some time and it's ridiculous to overturn several years of work for a political policy based solely on religion. |
| Date | not recorded | From | Noordelijk Bevrijding Front | To | Debating the Homosexual Marriage Appeal |
| Message | The dangerous rise of the religous right seems imminent. I hate to say I TOLD YOU SO |
| Date | not recorded | From | Dorvish Popular Front | To | Debating the Homosexual Marriage Appeal |
| Message | What an ignorant thing to say. First off, I have not mentioned religion, and our party has no official religion unlike calling yourself the Humanist party which makes it clear you are anti-religion. Also, why shouldnt there be a conservative option? You cant just say because a country has been liberal for several years it should always be liberal. Germany was Nazi for several years, it would be stupid to suggest they should still follow that party. |
| Date | not recorded | From | Dorvish Popular Front | To | Debating the Homosexual Marriage Appeal |
| Message | So I am against abortions, gay marriages and euthanasia (amongst other things) and am branded 'dangerous' and the 'religous right' despite never mentioning religion. The GRP changes to a humanist party and proposes bills making a church tax and a ban on religous schools and noone bats an eyelid - what is wrong with this country and negative perceptions of religion! |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 20 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 54 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: "Kubrk" is a Jelbic word that has the colloquial meaning "old man" or "geezer". |
| Random quote: "It is vain to talk of the interest of the community, without understanding what is the interest of the individual" - Jeremy Bentham |