Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5473
Next month in: 03:14:37
Server time: 08:45:22, April 23, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): albaniansunited | hyraemous | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Withdrawal Monarchists League

Details

Submitted by[?]: Hutori Republican Alliance

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 3891

Description[?]:

Withdraws Hutori from the Monarchists League

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date23:43:00, August 13, 2015 CET
FromChoice
ToDebating the Withdrawal Monarchists League
MessageMr Speaker

Can we ask the HRA to stop proposing the same proposals over and over again? It gets tiring.

Barry Farron MP
Leader of Choice

Date00:32:47, August 14, 2015 CET
FromHutori Republican Alliance
ToDebating the Withdrawal Monarchists League
MessageMr. Speaker,

I am sorry that the delegates from Choice are tired of excersizing their Parliamentary duties. However we have an obligation to represent the wishes of those who elected us and will continue to push for their causes until they are enacted into law.

Date00:35:49, August 14, 2015 CET
FromChoice
ToDebating the Withdrawal Monarchists League
MessageMr Speaker

How does proposing the same bills over and over again that are destined to fail representing the wishes of your voters? Surely your voters will see this and realise voting HRA is utterly pointless.

Barry Farron MP
Leader of Choice

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 93

no
     

Total Seats: 322

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context.

    Random quote: "Victory attained by violence is tantamount to a defeat, for it is momentary." - Mahatma Gandhi

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 44