We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of March 3910
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative Party of Luthori
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 3910
Description[?]:
| Mr. Speaker, We hope that all parties included in this cabinet proposal will support it, we believe that it will act more efficiently than Choice's bloated 5 party proposal. Jarred Williams Leader of the Conservatives |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Alliance Against Left
Article 2
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Alternative
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Alliance Against Left
Article 4
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Alternative
Article 5
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Alternative
Article 6
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Alternative
Article 7
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Alliance Against Left
Article 8
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Conservative Party of Luthori
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Conservative Party of Luthori
Article 10
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Liberal Alliance
Article 11
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Alliance Against Left
Article 12
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Conservative Party of Luthori
Article 13
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Conservative Party of Luthori
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 17:01:29, September 20, 2015 CET | From | Choice | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of March 3910 |
| Message | Mr Speaker Despite our coalition proposal having more parties, the parties in mine have more in common overall than in this coalition. For examples the Citizens are a centralist party whilst the rest are right-wing in this coalition, however in our coalition proposal each party is either centralist or centre left. Joe Purefoy MP Leader of Choice |
| Date | 17:14:52, September 20, 2015 CET | From | Conservative Party of Luthori | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of March 3910 |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, In Choice's bloated coalition, the Social Democratic League, is clearly left wing. I would argue that parties in this coalition have more in common considering, the Liberal Alliance, Conservatives and AAL are all Centre-Right, not Right-Wing. Jarred Williams Leader of the Conservatives |
| Date | 17:30:19, September 20, 2015 CET | From | Choice | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of March 3910 |
| Message | Mr Speaker First of all can we point out the SDL is actually closer to centre-left if anything and also that out of the coalition, our fair party is probably these days the furthest left. However we are more pragmatic and thus could balance the coalition. We would also like to note that this coalition in fact is not merely centre right, it is fully blown right-wing, with the Citizen's being drastically out of place. The majority of parties and people in Luthori are sick of being dominated by right-wing restrictive politics, with the last fully progressive government sadly being a distant memory. Despite your party coming first in terms of votes and seats, it is because most of the right leaning voters stuck to one party whilst the more centralist and left leaning parties all chose a variety of different parties. Joe Purefoy MP Leader of Choice Joe Purefoy MP Leader of Choice |
| Date | 18:01:30, September 20, 2015 CET | From | Alliance Against Left | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of March 3910 |
| Message | Mr Speaker, I believe that our party has a duty to prevent this country from a nightmare of socialist economy the Choice would want to introduce. Now we abstain, but if the Liberal Democrats vote for a criminal Joe Purefoy led coalition, we will vote in favour of the Conservatives' proposal - and we hope that the Party of the Citizenry will change their mind and vote in favour too as they consider themselves a party of right-wing economy policies, while Joy Purefoy has just named his party "being the furthest left these days". I yield. |
| Date | 18:07:07, September 20, 2015 CET | From | Choice | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of March 3910 |
| Message | Mr Speaker As we also stated, we said we were pragmatic, compromises in policy will be made. Joe Purefoy MP Leader of Choice |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 117 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 176 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 62 |
| Random fact: Moderation will not approve a Cultural Protocol request within the first 48 hours of it being requested. This is in order to give other players a chance to query the proposed changes, if they wish to do so. Moderation may be approached for advice on a proposed change, but any advice proffered should always be understood under the provisio that no final decision will be made until at least 48 hours after the request has been formally submitted for approval. |
| Random quote: "The superior man, when resting in safety, does not forget that danger may come. When in a state of security he does not forget the possibility of ruin. When all is orderly, he does not forget that disorder may come. Thus his person is not endangered, and his States and all their clans are preserved." - Confucius |