We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: President's Peace Plan Against UN Occupation (RP)
Details
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 3930
Description[?]:
| Mr Speaker, As proposed at the peace conference (OOC see the RP news Paramilitary Shootout in Vanderburg), the president's four point plan for peace is put forth at the Parliament as it involves legal affairs. 1. All paramilitary groups shall retreat from the areas of conflict immediately and let the central government resume control. 2. The government shall forgive all crimes committed by the paramilitary group. 3. All protesters shall leave the areas of conflict immediately or will be persecuted. 4. The paramilitary group shall proof and register all losses of equipment and fees for the period of conflict, payable by the government. 5. The paramilitary group of the United Nationalists should be the sole paramilitary group in Rutania, unless other legislation are passed. If this bill is passed, the bill Declaration of War against UN shall be ignored. If both bills are not passed, the peace conference will be handed over to the next administration. Signed by the President Paul Stansted |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 15:59:17, October 27, 2015 CET | From | Libertarian Party | To | Debating the President's Peace Plan Against UN Occupation (RP) |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, The Libertarian Party doesn't agree with article 4. We don't believe the government and thus the taxpayers, have to pay for the paramilitary group who may have murdered their beloved ones or someone they knew. We believe the paramilitary group must pay for the loss of equipment and the fees for the period of the conflict themselves. We also don't agree with article 5, there has been shown that the UN paramilitary group has committed themselves to more violence and crimes then any other paramilitary group. Ronald Paul and Nicklaus Romero Leader and Chairman LP |
| Date | 22:40:37, October 27, 2015 CET | From | National Brotherhood for Prosperity | To | Debating the President's Peace Plan Against UN Occupation (RP) |
| Message | Mr Speaker, This is outrageous. Articles 2, 4, and 5 are ridiculous. Forgiving them? Reimbursing them for equipment they damaged while murdering people? Allowing them to not only remain as a paramilitary organization, but eliminating all potential opponents? It sounds like the UN won. We cannot allow that. We will vote no. Richard Hall NBP Chairman |
| Date | 00:09:20, October 28, 2015 CET | From | United Nationalists | To | Debating the President's Peace Plan Against UN Occupation (RP) |
| Message | United Nationalist HQ "After much discussion we would be happy to accept if only you would remove the 2nd bills ending, Murder and Manslaughter. We won't have any of our men be persecuted for defending against rioting leftists." Ross Clark Defence Minister of UN |
| Date | 10:55:20, October 28, 2015 CET | From | Alliance | To | Debating the President's Peace Plan Against UN Occupation (RP) |
| Message | Mr Speaker If the administration does not act now, the next government will take over the peace process and therefore, the Progressives will now put the current version of the peace plan forward for voting and propose another act that will be of Declaration of War. If this bill is passed, the results of the latter shall be struck null and void by the administration, if the latter passes, we shall declare war. If neither is passed, the issue shall be handed over to the next administration. Paul Stansted President of the Commonwealth |
| Date | 22:19:06, October 28, 2015 CET | From | National Brotherhood for Prosperity | To | Debating the President's Peace Plan Against UN Occupation (RP) |
| Message | Mr Speaker, Now they are forgiven of all crimes? Worst deal that the government could have brokered. The President is a joke, he has the negotiating skills of a toddler. Any party that votes yes should feel guilty. You are forgiving murderers and traitors, and you are voting for the government to give in. Anyone who votes yes for this should go and visit the family members of those that the UN murdered, and explain to them why we are rewarding the UN for their crimes. All I can say is unbelievable. The Progressives should be ashamed of themselves. Richard Hall NBP Chairman |
| Date | 19:34:43, October 29, 2015 CET | From | Communist Party of Rutania | To | Debating the President's Peace Plan Against UN Occupation (RP) |
| Message | Mr Speaker, This peace proposal is a threat to the very existence of Rutania. Rather than weakening the UN, this would simply make them more stronger. The UN must be destroyed in order for Rutania to have peace, but the Progressives seem desperate to prevent that from happening. Sarah Clarkson CPR Secretary General |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 23 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 197 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 130 |
| Random fact: When it comes to creating a Cultural Protocol in a Culturally Open nation, players are not necessarily required to provide a plausible backstory for how the nation's cultural background developed. However, the provision of a plausible backstory may be a factor in whether Moderation approves the Cultural Protocol if players in surrounding nations question its appropriateness for their region of the game map. |
| Random quote: "It only takes 20 years for a liberal to become a conservative without changing a single idea." - Robert Anton Wilson |