Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5474
Next month in: 00:51:29
Server time: 07:08:30, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Choice Cabinet Proposal of January 3930

Details

Submitted by[?]: Choice

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 3930

Description[?]:

Proposing a moderate Cabinet in the hopes of keeping more extreme parties out of government.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date22:53:26, October 30, 2015 CET
FromLuthori Vision
ToDebating the Choice Cabinet Proposal of January 3930
MessageMr Speaker,

Even though i'm not in this cabinet, it is probably the best choice for the nation, unlike the damp wet rags currently serving as PCP members.

I yield
Daly Elliston MD, Leader of the Imperial Party

Date01:29:21, October 31, 2015 CET
FromLuthori National Union Party
ToDebating the Choice Cabinet Proposal of January 3930
MessageMr. Speaker,

It is nice to see that the Imperial Party are willing to call a left-wing cabinet headed by republicans "the best choice for the nation" due to an irrational hatreds of the PCP. I'm glad to see what forthright defenders of the monarchy they are.

As for the cabinet itself, I am deeply troubled by the amount of members who are now in charge of His Majesty's Government who are of a republican persuasion. How can they be leaders of His Majesty's Government when they believe that His Majesty should have no greater position in society than any other man.

I yield.

Robert Patterson
Leader of the LNUP, Interim Minister of Foreign Affairs

Date01:59:49, October 31, 2015 CET
FromLuthori Vision
ToDebating the Choice Cabinet Proposal of January 3930
MessageMr Speaker,

I disagree with the members of Choice and other parties that support republicanism, however they are the most stable government. With your government i cast a vote of no confidence, and i stand by it. You see the parties in this cabinet aren't discriminating against my party, unlike you and your little sidekicks PCP.

I yield
Daly Elliston MD, Leader of the Imperial Party

Date02:33:25, October 31, 2015 CET
FromUnited Luthori
ToDebating the Choice Cabinet Proposal of January 3930
MessageMr. Speaker,

I don't believe Mr. Elliston understands the term "vote of no confidence". The election of 3930 was a scheduled election, not a vote of no confidence. The parties of this nation have agreed to a set of terms as to when it is appropriate to call such an election.

As for the matter at hand, we agree with the LNUP. The PCP has reservations about the ability for members of the proposed cabinet to carry out the interests of the people and His Majesty when a central tenet of their policy is to abolish the monarchy. We hope that despite their republican beliefs, that they will continue to serve the Emperor.

Peter Buckley MP
Leader of the PCP

Date02:54:26, October 31, 2015 CET
FromLuthori Vision
ToDebating the Choice Cabinet Proposal of January 3930
MessageMr Speaker,

We do understand the term vote of no confidence, due to the fact we had no MD's, we thought it irresponsible to put forward an early election however we put the motion on the table for an MD to pick up, which no-one did. We are supporting this Cabinet as a sign of faith to show that we're not a power hungry party, which you and LNUP have accused our power of being!

I yield
Daly Elliston MD, Leader of the Imperial Party

Date11:14:52, October 31, 2015 CET
FromChoice
ToDebating the Choice Cabinet Proposal of January 3930
MessageMr Speaker

We thank the Imperial Party for their honesty about their support, despite it being somewhat surprising due to their political alignment. It truly does further show the lack of faith the Diet has in your party Mr Patterson, with even the Liberal Alliance, your former coalition partner turning to a more centralist persuasion. We would also like to point out that our republicanism will not effect the way we serve the country, our government serve the people and if that includes being pragmatic about the monarchy, then so be it. Also do note the Liberal Alliance is a monarchist party thus the entire government are not headed by republicans, and the only republican parties in the Diet don't even command a majority combined let along the necessary two thirds required for its removal. And in response to the PCP, yes we will continue to "serve the emperor" as it benefits the people that we will in turn be serving.

The Rt. Hon. Vincent Wilkinson MD
Leader of Choice

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 176

no
   

Total Seats: 135

abstain
 

Total Seats: 44


Random fact: The players in a nation have a collective responsibility to ensure their "Bills under debate" section is kept in good order. Bills which are irrelevant or have become irrelevant should be deleted. Deletion can be requested for bills proposed by inactive parties on the Bill Clearout Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4363

Random quote: "It is obvious that the laissez-faire ideology represents the interests of big business. For decades, the right-wing has opposed welfare programs and nationalised companies, in favour of big business disguised under 'economic liberty'." - Cecilia Xu, former Gaduri politician

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 72