Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5471
Next month in: 01:15:55
Server time: 10:44:04, April 18, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Freemarket21 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Legislative Freedom Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Social Reform Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 2172

Description[?]:

We should no longer allow treaties to determine our legislation, or to further stop confederation!

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date17:02:52, January 15, 2006 CET
FromFreedom Party
ToDebating the Legislative Freedom Act
MessageAbsolute nonsense!

Date17:50:13, January 15, 2006 CET
FromDemocratic Liberal Party
ToDebating the Legislative Freedom Act
MessageWow, this is incredible. SRP calls itself Liberal Democratic. They're really just ICP followers too scared to step out of line.

Date21:08:22, January 15, 2006 CET
FromIndependent Capitalist Party
ToDebating the Legislative Freedom Act
MessageOh, come on. We shouldn't be restricted. If you're against a law, then vote against it. Of course, this would be too inconvienent to the Freedom Party's visibilities...

Date06:03:27, January 16, 2006 CET
FromSocial Reform Party
ToDebating the Legislative Freedom Act
MessageThese treaties are preventing additional devolution bills, which is preventing Aloria from being truely itself -- a confederacy. These treaties aren't for internationalism, they're for conformity between nations, and destroying national identity.

Date08:53:32, January 16, 2006 CET
From Aloria Green Socialist Party
ToDebating the Legislative Freedom Act
MessageRubbish. Confederation isn't the be all and end all. What do you specifically disagree about in the clauses of these treaties?

Date15:38:34, January 16, 2006 CET
FromIndependent Capitalist Party
ToDebating the Legislative Freedom Act
MessageAbsolutely nothing. I disagree against the principal - the international community REGULATING what we can and cannot do. ICP against regulation, remember?

Date18:02:28, January 16, 2006 CET
From Aloria Green Socialist Party
ToDebating the Legislative Freedom Act
MessageLordy. In all it's forms? No laws?

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 168

no
      

Total Seats: 310

abstain
 

Total Seats: 122


Random fact: Use a valid e-mail address for your Particracy account. If the e-mail address you entered does not exist, your account may be suspected of multi-accounting and inactivated.

Random quote: "Hatred is not, and should never be considered as another form of freedom of expression." - Icarion Dadhelus, former Selucian politician

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 63