Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5470
Next month in: 02:36:54
Server time: 13:23:05, April 16, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): Caoimhean | Mbites2 | MnarĀ¢ist unin | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of August 3934

Details

Submitted by[?]: Beluzian Coalition of the Regions

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 3935

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date15:41:08, November 08, 2015 CET
FromBailonese Council Communist Party (BCCP)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of August 3934
MessageWe appreciate the position the BCR has proposed, but we would prefer that the Liberal Democratic Party has at least one seat on the cabinet as they are the second largest party by seats.

Date16:05:29, November 08, 2015 CET
FromDemocratic Socialist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of August 3934
MessageThe LDP will not participate in a coalition with parties that blocked all of its bills.

Date16:18:24, November 08, 2015 CET
FromDemocratic Socialist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of August 3934
MessageBesides,we find it insulting that we,as the second largest party,don't even get a single seat on the cabinet, according to this proposal.

Date17:00:07, November 08, 2015 CET
FromBeluzian Coalition of the Regions
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of August 3934
MessageSomething has to be done to have this nation governed again. Indeed, the LDP has not been included because we have almost nothing in common as stated by the LDP themselves.

Date18:01:57, November 08, 2015 CET
FromDemocratic Socialist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of August 3934
MessageWe wonder what the BCR means by "have this nation governed again",since they refused every bill since February 3932.

Date18:03:34, November 08, 2015 CET
FromBailonese Council Communist Party (BCCP)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of August 3934
MessageSince the LDP do not want to be involved in a coalition, the EPB will support this bill.

Date18:10:48, November 08, 2015 CET
FromBailonese Council Communist Party (BCCP)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of August 3934
MessageTo be fair LDP, the BCR was mainly rejecting the overwhelming number of bills that attacked the decentralized system that the BCR founded. We too voted against most of the bills that promoted centralization.

Date18:14:44, November 08, 2015 CET
FromDemocratic Socialist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of August 3934
MessageWe also wonder why a party that proclaims itself as being a single-issue party is so worried about centralization.

Date20:01:16, November 08, 2015 CET
FromBeluzian Coalition of the Regions
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of August 3934
MessageWe thank the EPB for their constructive support. We do hope that the NSWP will vote in favour too.

Date20:54:11, November 08, 2015 CET
FromDemocratic Socialist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of August 3934
MessageI will not vote in favour of an anti-legislative government.

Date22:11:48, November 08, 2015 CET
FromBailonese Council Communist Party (BCCP)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of August 3934
MessageThe LDP has a point, our party has become over the years more than a single-issue party. We do have other opinions other than euthanasia, but the main reason why we remain to be a single-issue party is because we will not run for any position other than Health and Social Services.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 483

no
 

Total Seats: 167

abstain
   

Total Seats: 100


Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play.

Random quote: "The streets are safe in Philadelphia, it's only the people who make them unsafe." - Frank Rizzo

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 62