We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Communal Rights to Dictate PDA
Details
Submitted by[?]: Bailonese Council Communist Party (BCCP)
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 3942
Description[?]:
PDA: Public display of affection We, the Confederates, believe that local governments deserve the right to dictate their rules on any public display of affection within their communities. Although our party believes it should be banned, we believe strongly in the right for locals to decide upon this issue. Let the townsmen rule the townsmen. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Displays of public affection and obscenity laws.
Old value:: There are no laws regarding obscene public acts.
Current: Sexual intercourse is illegal in public.
Proposed: Local governments may regulate laws on public acts of affection and obscenity.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 04:43:23, November 21, 2015 CET | From | Progressive Coalition | To | Debating the Communal Rights to Dictate PDA |
Message | Unless another party can make a strong case against this bill the PC will support this. |
Date | 07:30:07, November 21, 2015 CET | From | Bailonese Council Communist Party (BCCP) | To | Debating the Communal Rights to Dictate PDA |
Message | We appreciate the support of the PC for this bill. We hope the other parties will support this proposal as well. It is better to not force laws upon unwilling localities, such repression only plants the seeds for rebellion - which even as confederates, we would certainly prefer to prevent if peaceful reform is possible. |
Date | 15:00:51, November 21, 2015 CET | From | Communist Party of Beluzia | To | Debating the Communal Rights to Dictate PDA |
Message | We find it kind of ironic - that the Confederate Party wants to limit the "repression" by granting local goverments rights to regulate and potentially outlaw such acts. You speak that it's better to not force laws upon localities, yet under current system no such laws exist. It is concerning this bill may allow to limit civil liberties of Beluzian citizens in the name of federalism. |
Date | 19:02:16, November 21, 2015 CET | From | Bailonese Council Communist Party (BCCP) | To | Debating the Communal Rights to Dictate PDA |
Message | Down with the federation, we want a confederation of states. There is currently a law on it, it forces localities not to place regulations. We want them to have freedom to place regulations. Don't tread on our local governments. |
Date | 19:43:13, November 21, 2015 CET | From | Progressive Coalition | To | Debating the Communal Rights to Dictate PDA |
Message | This radical outburst against the national government of the Federal Republic of Beluz is quite frankly shocking and extremely disconcerting. The PC will be reversing our position on this bill. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 488 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 262 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: The voters enjoy active parties who take upon themselves the initiative to create laws. |
Random quote: "A liberal is a man or a woman or a child who looks forward to a better day, a more tranquil night, and a bright, infinite future." - Leonard Bernstein |