Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5474
Next month in: 01:58:31
Server time: 14:01:28, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): Liu Che | ZulanALD | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Communal Rights to Dictate PDA

Details

Submitted by[?]: Bailonese Council Communist Party (BCCP)

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 3942

Description[?]:

PDA: Public display of affection

We, the Confederates, believe that local governments deserve the right to dictate their rules on any public display of affection within their communities. Although our party believes it should be banned, we believe strongly in the right for locals to decide upon this issue. Let the townsmen rule the townsmen.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date04:43:23, November 21, 2015 CET
FromProgressive Coalition
ToDebating the Communal Rights to Dictate PDA
MessageUnless another party can make a strong case against this bill the PC will support this.

Date07:30:07, November 21, 2015 CET
FromBailonese Council Communist Party (BCCP)
ToDebating the Communal Rights to Dictate PDA
MessageWe appreciate the support of the PC for this bill. We hope the other parties will support this proposal as well. It is better to not force laws upon unwilling localities, such repression only plants the seeds for rebellion - which even as confederates, we would certainly prefer to prevent if peaceful reform is possible.

Date15:00:51, November 21, 2015 CET
FromCommunist Party of Beluzia
ToDebating the Communal Rights to Dictate PDA
MessageWe find it kind of ironic - that the Confederate Party wants to limit the "repression" by granting local goverments rights to regulate and potentially outlaw such acts. You speak that it's better to not force laws upon localities, yet under current system no such laws exist. It is concerning this bill may allow to limit civil liberties of Beluzian citizens in the name of federalism.

Date19:02:16, November 21, 2015 CET
FromBailonese Council Communist Party (BCCP)
ToDebating the Communal Rights to Dictate PDA
MessageDown with the federation, we want a confederation of states. There is currently a law on it, it forces localities not to place regulations. We want them to have freedom to place regulations. Don't tread on our local governments.

Date19:43:13, November 21, 2015 CET
FromProgressive Coalition
ToDebating the Communal Rights to Dictate PDA
MessageThis radical outburst against the national government of the Federal Republic of Beluz is quite frankly shocking and extremely disconcerting. The PC will be reversing our position on this bill.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 488

no
    

Total Seats: 262

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: The voters enjoy active parties who take upon themselves the initiative to create laws.

Random quote: "A liberal is a man or a woman or a child who looks forward to a better day, a more tranquil night, and a bright, infinite future." - Leonard Bernstein

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 56