We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Management of Law and Order Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Bailonese Council Communist Party (BCCP)
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 3945
Description[?]:
Local governments already fund their own police forces, it only makes sense for them to determine the policy of which they fund and maintain. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government's policy towards the powers of the police.
Old value:: The police may arrest crime suspects.
Current: The police may arrest crime suspects.
Proposed: Powers of police are left to the local government .
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy towards police presence.
Old value:: The police patrol public property at all times.
Current: Presence of the police is left to the local governments.
Proposed: Presence of the police is left to the local governments.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Police searches.
Old value:: The police cannot search a person or their property without their consent unless the police have obtained a warrant from a court or in cases of imminent danger.
Current: The police cannot search a person or their property without their consent unless the police have obtained a warrant from a court.
Proposed: Local governments deal with this issue.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 14:13:46, November 28, 2015 CET | From | Democratic Socialist Party | To | Debating the Management of Law and Order Act |
Message | We feel this is wrong on every level. |
Date | 16:22:22, November 28, 2015 CET | From | Bailonese Council Communist Party (BCCP) | To | Debating the Management of Law and Order Act |
Message | We would then urge to petition your local government concerning this. However, would you agree to this act if article 1 and 3 were removed? This is a hypothetical question, if the NSWP agrees to all articles above, we will not make a compromise. |
Date | 03:01:42, November 29, 2015 CET | From | Progressive Coalition | To | Debating the Management of Law and Order Act |
Message | The Progressive Coalition will vehemently oppose this bill. We do not understand why anyone would wish to decrease the power of the police. This bill goes too far in the name of federalism and is quite frankly extremely irresponsible. This bill would put States rights above the safety of our own citizens. |
Date | 17:03:25, November 29, 2015 CET | From | Bailonese Council Communist Party (BCCP) | To | Debating the Management of Law and Order Act |
Message | To be fair, local governments are voted in by the locales they serve. It only makes sense for those people to determine their own rights. |
Date | 01:24:03, November 30, 2015 CET | From | Revolutionary Marxist Party | To | Debating the Management of Law and Order Act |
Message | Against Article 3 for article 1 & 2. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 528 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 222 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Information about the population of each country can be found on the Population Information thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=8663 |
Random quote: "The secret of freedom lies in educating people, whereas the secret of tyranny is in keeping them ignorant." - Maximilien Robespierre |