We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Police Presence Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Libertarian Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 3951
Description[?]:
| Mr. Speaker, We believe in a small government, restricted police powers are part of this. Nadine Spence Representative Ardinia Leader LP |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy towards police presence.
Old value:: The police patrol public property at all times.
Current: The police patrol public property at all times.
Proposed: The police do not actively patrol public property.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 02:20:24, December 09, 2015 CET | From | The Worker's Union (WU) | To | Debating the Police Presence Act |
| Message | Mr Speaker, Police presence in public areas is essential for public safety and quick response times to emergencies. We can see absolutely no public benefit to limiting police patrols. Sophie Malto, Chairman of the Workers Front |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 47 | ||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 203 | ||||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: If there are no parties in your nation with seats, feel free to visit the forum and request an early election on the Early Election Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4362 |
| Random quote: "The National Rifle Association says, 'Guns don't kill people; people kill people,' but I think the gun helps." - Eddie Izzard |